Word Meaning and Legal Interpretation
Title | Word Meaning and Legal Interpretation PDF eBook |
Author | Christopher Mark Hutton |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
Pages | 260 |
Release | 2017-09-09 |
Genre | Language Arts & Disciplines |
ISBN | 1137016167 |
This book introduces ideas about word meaning in the context of law. It analyzes cases from common law jurisdictions that concern the meaning, definition and legal status of individual words, labels and categories. The focus is on the question of how law assigns authority over word meaning in different circumstances and in different domains of law.
Ordinary Meaning
Title | Ordinary Meaning PDF eBook |
Author | Brian G. Slocum |
Publisher | University of Chicago Press |
Pages | 366 |
Release | 2015-12-22 |
Genre | Language Arts & Disciplines |
ISBN | 022630485X |
Brian G. Slocum s "Ordinary Meaning "offers an extended legal-linguistic analysis of the eponymous interpretive doctrine. A centuries-old consensus exists among courts and legal scholars that words in legal texts should be interpreted in light of accepted standards of communication. Therefore the questions of what makes some meaning the ordinary one, and how the determinants of ordinary meaning are identified and conceptualized, are of crucial importance to the interpretation of legal texts. Arguing against reliance on acontextual dictionary definitions, "Ordinary Meaning" rigorously explores the contributions that specific context makes to meaning, along with linguistic phenomena such as indexicals and quantifiers. Slocum provides a theory and a robust general framework for how the determinants of ordinary meaning should be identified and developed."
LAW & LANGUAGE
Title | LAW & LANGUAGE PDF eBook |
Author | Tsz-Shan Wei |
Publisher | Open Dissertation Press |
Pages | 194 |
Release | 2017-01-27 |
Genre | Language Arts & Disciplines |
ISBN | 9781374712195 |
This dissertation, "Law and Language: Problems of Meaning and Interpretation in the Hong Kong Courts" by Tsz-shan, Wei, 韋子山, was obtained from The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong) and is being sold pursuant to Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License. The content of this dissertation has not been altered in any way. We have altered the formatting in order to facilitate the ease of printing and reading of the dissertation. All rights not granted by the above license are retained by the author. Abstract: Abstract of thesis entitled Law and Language: Problems of Meaning and Interpretation in the Hong Kong Courts submitted by Wei Tsz Shan for the degree of Master of Philosophy at the University of Hong Kong in November 2000 When we talk about legal disputes in law cases, all of them can be generalized as the question: does 'X' fall within the meaning of 'Y'?; that is, they can be understood as questions of 'categorization'. A legal judgment is actually a decision of categorizing a factual scenario (i.e. the alleged act) into a 'category' (i.e. the provision of a statute). If the act of the defendant (i.e. X) is considered by judges (or the jury) as falling within the provision of the statute (i.e. Y), the defendant shall be convicted. In considering whether 'X' (i.e. a concept, an event or an object) is 'Y', the legal practitioners have to know the meaning of 'X' and 'Y'. However, it is not easy to clarify what do 'X' and "Y' mean. Lord Reid's remarks, 'Normally, the meaning of words, is a question of law for the courts' and 'the meaning of an ordinary word of the English language is not a question of law', can be perceived as a precise description of the problems of meaning in legal interpretation. Language is intrinsically indeterminate. The legal practitioners are working with the problems of ambiguity and vagueness, open texture of words and penumbra of uncertainty, and blurred word boundaries etc. The adoption of different interpretive approaches and other factors, such as habitual collocation, legislative intents and intended social effects, authenticity of the two language texts and hierarchical structure of the courts will also contribute to the complexity of interpretation. i Under a monolingual legal system, legal practitioners normally have to face the problems of meaning of one language only. Under a bilingual (or multi-lingual) legal system, with the addition of one (or more) language(s), they have to face, at least, one more problems i.e. translatability, which will complicate the job of legal interpretation. In Hong Kong, because legal bilingualism is practised, both the Chinese and the English language texts are equally authentic. Neither text shall prevail over the other. If discrepancies in meaning exist between the two language texts, reconciliation has to be found. The problems of translatability will not only aggravate the already-existing problems of legal interpretation, but also create more. Two approaches: the dictionary and prototype theory have been employed to see if they can, or cannot, help to deal with the problems of meaning in law. The dictionary and prototype theory have been selected because the former serves the purpose of defining meanings; the latter is concerned with classification. Seven court cases have been selected as the testing grounds for the contribution of these two means. Six of them took place in Hong Kong and one is from the jurisdiction of the United States. The focal points of discussion of this thesis are (1) how word meanings are interpreted in different legal contexts; (2) what problems of interpretation will be; and (3) whether the dictionary and prototype theory have a role to play in solving problems of legal interpretation. ii DOI: 10.5353/th_b2973969 Subjects: Law - China - Hong Kong - Interpretation and constru
A New Law-dictionary
Title | A New Law-dictionary PDF eBook |
Author | Giles Jacob |
Publisher | |
Pages | 832 |
Release | 1744 |
Genre | Law |
ISBN |
Ordinary Meaning
Title | Ordinary Meaning PDF eBook |
Author | Brian G. Slocum |
Publisher | University of Chicago Press |
Pages | 366 |
Release | 2015-12-22 |
Genre | Law |
ISBN | 022630499X |
A legal scholar offers a bold new framework for legal interpretation with this “deep, thoughtful, and useful examination . . . of legal meaning” (William Eskridge, Yale University). Consider a criminal sentencing provision that calls for enhanced punishment if a defendant “uses” a firearm during a drug crime. Has a defendant violated the provision if he trades a gun for drugs? Did he “use” the gun in the intended sense? This sort of question is at the heart of legal interpretation. Legal interpretation typically follows the doctrine of “ordinary meaning” —which is to say that words in legal texts should be interpreted in light of accepted standards of communication. Yet often, courts fail to properly consider context, refer to unsuitable dictionary definitions, or otherwise misconceive how the ordinary meaning of words should be determined. In this book, Brian Slocum argues for a new method of interpretation by asking glaring, yet largely ignored, questions. What makes one particular meaning the “ordinary” one, and how exactly do courts conceptualize the elements of ordinary meaning? Ordinary Meaning provides a much-needed reassessment of how the components of ordinary meaning should properly be identified and developed in our modern legal system.
A new law-dictionary containing the interpretation and definition of words and terms used in the law etc
Title | A new law-dictionary containing the interpretation and definition of words and terms used in the law etc PDF eBook |
Author | Giles Jacob |
Publisher | |
Pages | 790 |
Release | 1729 |
Genre | |
ISBN |
The Judicial Interpretation of Common Words and Phrases
Title | The Judicial Interpretation of Common Words and Phrases PDF eBook |
Author | Irving Browne |
Publisher | |
Pages | 560 |
Release | 1883 |
Genre | Law |
ISBN |