In 1971, Idi Amin Dada, seized power in a military coup in Uganda. Characterized by human rights abuses, political repression, ethnic persecution, judicial killings, corruption and economic mismanagement, Amin's rule drove thousands into exile. With Tanzanian leader Julius Nyerere offering sanctuary to Uganda's ousted president, Milton Obote, Ugand

Why do only some incipient rebel groups become viable challengers to governments? Only those that control local rumor networks survive.

Human Rights Watch presents "Rwandan Patriotic Front," a section of the March 1999 report entitled "Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide in Rwanda." Human Rights Watch credits the Rwandan Patriotic Front for ending the 1994 genocide in Rwanda by defeating the civilian and military authorities responsible for the killing.

Wars of Insurgency is a simple, fast-play set of rules for modern warfare. It gives the flavor of "low intensity" or guerrilla warfare without getting bogged down in complexity of trying to simulate every weapon. Players control 3-5 squads of 3-12 miniatures -- with each figure representing one man. The rules include a complete campaign rules set allowing players to take on the role of factions fighting for control of their historical or fictional country. Political schemes, permanent institutions, and a system for eventual victory of one faction give more ways to spice up your miniatures games with a storyline. Three scenarios and guidelines for using historical events to create new ones are included. A complete point system allows Elite, Regular, and Militia troops to be matched up for fair games.

It has been over three decades since the Union Jack was lowered on the colony of Rhodesia, but the bitter and divisive civil war that preceded it has continued to endure as a textbook counterinsurgency campaign fought between a mobile, motivated and highly trained Rhodesian security establishment and two constituted liberations movements motivated, resourced and inspired by the ideals of communist revolution in the third world. A complicated historical process of occupation and colonization set the tone as early as the late 1890s for what would at some point be an inevitable struggle for domination of this small, landlocked nation set in the southern tropics of Africa. The story of the Rhodesian War, or the Zimbabwean Liberation Struggle, is not only an epic of superb military achievement, and revolutionary zeal and fervor, but is the tale of the incompatibility of the races in southern Africa, a clash of politics and ideals and, perhaps more importantly, the ongoing ramifications of the past upon the present, and the social and political scars that a war of such emotional underpinnings as the Rhodesian conflict has had on the modern psyche of Zimbabwe. The Rhodesian War was fought with finely tuned intelligence-gathering and -analysis techniques combined with a fluid and mobile armed response. The practitioners of both have justifiably been celebrated in countless histories, memoirs and campaign analyses, but what has never been attempted has been a concise, balanced and explanatory overview of the war, the military mechanisms and the social and political foundations that defined the crisis. This book does all of that. The Rhodesian War is explained in digestible detail and in a manner that will allow enthusiasts of the elements of that struggle - the iconic exploits of the Rhodesian Light Infantry, the SAS, the Selous Scouts, the Rhodesian African Rifles, the Rhodesia Regiment, among other well-known fighting units - to embrace the wider picture in order to place the various episodes in context

Oil, diamonds, timber, food aid - just some of the suggestions put forward as explanations for African wars in the past decade. Another set of suggestions focuses on ethnic and clan considerations. These economic and ethnic or clan explanations contend that wars are specifically not fought by states for political interests with mainly conventional military means, as originally suggested by Carl von Clausewitz in the 19th century. This study shows how alternative social organizations to the state can be viewed as political actors using war as a political instrument.