United States of America V. Decoteau
Title | United States of America V. Decoteau PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | |
Pages | 30 |
Release | 1990 |
Genre | |
ISBN |
United States of America V. Steele
Title | United States of America V. Steele PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | |
Pages | 50 |
Release | 1992 |
Genre | |
ISBN |
United States Reports
Title | United States Reports PDF eBook |
Author | United States. Supreme Court |
Publisher | |
Pages | 1042 |
Release | 2012 |
Genre | Law reports, digests, etc |
ISBN |
Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993
Title | Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993 PDF eBook |
Author | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Native American Affairs |
Publisher | |
Pages | 1002 |
Release | 1993 |
Genre | Law |
ISBN |
Final report
Title | Final report PDF eBook |
Author | United States. American Indian Policy Review Commission |
Publisher | |
Pages | 980 |
Release | 1977 |
Genre | |
ISBN |
Environmental Administrative Decisions
Title | Environmental Administrative Decisions PDF eBook |
Author | United States. Environmental Protection Agency |
Publisher | |
Pages | 842 |
Release | 2008 |
Genre | Environmental law |
ISBN |
American Indian Sovereignty and the U.S. Supreme Court
Title | American Indian Sovereignty and the U.S. Supreme Court PDF eBook |
Author | David E. Wilkins |
Publisher | University of Texas Press |
Pages | 426 |
Release | 2010-01-01 |
Genre | Social Science |
ISBN | 0292774001 |
"Like the miner's canary, the Indian marks the shift from fresh air to poison gas in our political atmosphere; and our treatment of Indians, even more than our treatment of other minorities, reflects the rise and fall in our democratic faith," wrote Felix S. Cohen, an early expert in Indian legal affairs. In this book, David Wilkins charts the "fall in our democratic faith" through fifteen landmark cases in which the Supreme Court significantly curtailed Indian rights. He offers compelling evidence that Supreme Court justices selectively used precedents and facts, both historical and contemporary, to arrive at decisions that have undermined tribal sovereignty, legitimated massive tribal land losses, sanctioned the diminishment of Indian religious rights, and curtailed other rights as well. These case studies—and their implications for all minority groups—make important and troubling reading at a time when the Supreme Court is at the vortex of political and moral developments that are redefining the nature of American government, transforming the relationship between the legal and political branches, and altering the very meaning of federalism.