Under the classification system of 'Elementary-Emergent Fundamental Laws', Fundamental Laws will consist of Elementary Fundamental Laws and Emergent Fundamental Laws. Generally speaking, the broad fields of Medicine and Religion will predominantly obey Emergent Fundamental Laws, and the broad fields of Mathematics and Science will predominantly obey Elementary Fundamental Laws. Then the common denominator 'Fundamental Laws' will unify the two fields of Medicine and Religion with the seemingly different two fields of Mathematics and Science. In fact, all other 'broad fields' can be united to each other under the banner 'Fundamental Laws'.

This book investigates the nature and relevance of conjunctive explanations in the context of science and religion. It explores questions concerning how scientific and religious explanations for features of the world or phenomena within it relate to each other and whether they might work together in mutually enriching ways. The chapters address topics including the relationship between Darwinian and teleological explanations, non-reductive explanations of mind and consciousness, and explanations of Christian faith and religious experience, while others explore theological and philosophical issues concerning the nature and feasibility of conjunctive explanations. Overall, the contributions help to provide conceptual clarity on how scientific and religious explanations might or might not work together conjunctively as well as exploring how these ideas relate to specific topics in science and religion more generally.

The word was made flesh is conservation of the circle as a unit. God and man articulates a circle. Thus symbolic behavior unifies science and religion (biology and mathematics). The unit is duplicitous.

An examination of the similar truths in the religions of the world. Topic include Scientific Religion, Divine Will, the Nature of God, Evolution, Prayer, and the Sacraments.

The Kenneth May Lectures have never before been published in book form Important contributions to the history of mathematics by well-known historians of science Should appeal to a wide audience due to its subject area and accessibility

This book examines the ways in which contemporary British and British postcolonial writers in the after-empire era draw connections between magic (defined here as Renaissance Hermetic philosophy) and science. Writers such as Tom Stoppard, Zadie Smith, and Margaret Atwood critique both imperial science, or science used in service to empire, and what Renk calls "imperical science," a distortion of rational science which denies that reality is holistic and claims that nature can and should be conquered. In warning of the dangers of imperical science, these writers restore the connection between magic and science as they examine major shifts in scientific thinking across the centuries. They reflect on the Copernican Revolution and the historic split between magic and science, scrutinize Darwinism, consider the relationship between Victorian science and pseudo-science, analyze twentieth-century Uncertainty theories, reject bio/genetic engineering, call for a new approach to science that reconnects science and art, and ultimately endeavor to bring an end to the imperial age. Overall, these writers forge a new discourse that merges science with the arts and emphasizes a holistic philosophy, a view shared by both Hermetic philosophy and recent scientific theories, such as chaos or complexity theory. Along with recent books that focus on the relationship between contemporary literature and science, this work focuses on contemporary British literature’s critique of science and the ways in which postcolonial literature addresses the relationship between magic, science, and empire.