In January of 1972, a request for proposals, or RFP, was issued to lay out the guidelines for a new utility helicopter to replace the Bell UH-1 Iroquois type. The Huey had served admirably in the Vietnam conflict, but it lacked engine power, was vulnerable to small-arms fire, and was limited in lifting/transporting heavy external payloads. Under the UTTAS (Utility Tactical Transport Aircraft System) competition, the new clean-sheet design intended to rectify all of the UH-1's shortcomings, while integrating the latest technology developments in helicopter construction and power-plant design. This new helicopter would be capable of a cruising speed of 167-201mph/145-174kts (269-324km/h) and be able to maintain this speed for a minimum of 2.3 hours. It had to carry an 11-man infantry squad, with all of their gear, in hot temperature/high altitude scenarios. If troops were not to be carried, that same lifting power provided by two engines would instead lift underslung cargo loads, up to a maximum of 8,000 lbs/3629kg. The cargo cabin space had to be able to be converted with a minimum of effort for use in aeromedical evacuation, utility roles or as an infantry assault transport. Illustrated with over 250b/w and color photos.

The United States Army uses variations of the UH-60 Black Hawk to perform a wide variety of missions. The Black Hawk has been the primary helicopter of the Army for over 30 years. This book explains what the Black Hawk is, what equipment it uses to complete missions, and why it has been so successful in its missions.

First introduced in the mid-1980s, the U.S. Navy's Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk helicopter fulfills a wide range of functions from combat to providing relief to populations stricken by natural disasters. Based on the U.S. Army's UH-60 Black Hawk, and developed in accordance with the Light Airborne Multi-Purpose System or LAMPS concept of helicopters that extend the search, detection, surveillance, and attack capabilities of ships, the Seahawk family of Navy choppers is distinguished by its hinged tail that facilitates operations from giant aircraft carriers or diminutive destroyers and frigates. The author introduces you to the SH-60F Ocean Hawk with its AQS-13F dunking sonar for detecting submerged vessels, the HH-60H "Rescue Hawk," that can fly 250 nautical miles from base to perform a rescue and then return to base and which also serves in sea-air-land (SEAL) team operations, the MH-60R "Strikehawk" loaded with sophisticated avionics that facilitate undersea warfare and surface warfare operations in shallow littoral regions as well as deep, blue water ocean environments, and finally the MH-60S "Knighthawk" with its two cabin doors that does everything from aeromedical evacuation and search and rescue to mine countermeasures and special operations transport.

Over 900 pages ... Just a sample of the contents: LANDING GEAR TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE ACTION: Determine the major components and operational characteristics of the UH-60 landing gear system. CONDITIONS: Given multiple choices, visual representations of the UH-60 landing gear system components, and applicable references. STANDARDS : Select from multiple choices, the major components and operating characteristics of the UH-60 landing gear system. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS- Use care when operating training aids and/or devices. RISK ASSESSMENT- Low. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS- None. EVALUATION: This block of instruction will be tested on the UH-60 aviation subjects written examination I (011-1374). A minimum score of 70% is required for passing. LEARNING STEP / ACTIVITY 1 Identify the primary components and operational characteristics of the UH-60 main landing gear system. Crash Worthiness UH-60 Main Landing Gear System Description: conventional, non-retractable, reverse tricycle arrangement. Components: Drag beam. Axle assembly. Main shock strut. Main wheel assembly. Wheel brake. Drag Beam Drag Beam Switches Drag Beam Strut at Rest Strut Under High Impact Load Strut Airborne Kneeling Valves Main Wheel Tire Details Master Cylinders Slave Cylinders/Parking Brake Valve Parking Brake Schematic Brake Wear Check Check On Learning Question: The lower stage of the main landing gear struts is designed to absorb landing loads up to ____ feet per second. Answer: 10 LEARNING STEP / ACTIVITY 2 Identify the primary components and operational characteristics of the UH-60 tail landing gear system. UH-60 Tail Landing Gear System Tail landing gear. Operation. Tail wheel assembly. Swivels 360 degrees. Upper end of strut. Yoke of tail gear. Fork assembly. Split aluminum rim. Tail wheel lock system. Tail Landing Gear Assembly Tail Strut Tail Yoke and Fork Tailwheel Lock System Tail Wheel Lock Check On Learning Question: Power to operate the tail wheel lock system is provided through the ____ bus. Answer: DC essential. SUMMARY Identified the primary components and operational characteristics of the UH-60 main landing gear system. Identified the primary components and operational characteristics of the UH-60 tail landing gear system. BREAK TIME! POWERTRAIN AND ROTOR SYSTEM TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE ACTION: Determine the major components and operational characteristics of the UH-60 powertrain system. CONDITIONS: Given multiple choices, visual representations of the UH-60 powertrain system components, and applicable references. STANDARDS : Select from multiple choices, the major components and operating characteristics of the UH-60 powertrain system. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS- Use care when operating training aids and/or devices. RISK ASSESSMENT- Low. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS- None. EVALUATION: This block of instruction will be tested on the UH-60 aviation subjects written examination I (011-1374). A minimum score of 70% is required for passing. ENABLING LEARNING OBJECTIVE A ACTION: Identify the operational characteristics and modules of the UH-60 main transmission system. CONDITIONS: Given multiple choices, visual representations of the UH-60 main transmission system, and applicable references. STANDARDS: Select from multiple choices, the characteristics of the UH-60 main transmission system. Main Transmission Location Main Transmission Components Input and Accessory Modules Freewheeling Unit Accessory Module Main Module Details Check On Learning Question: The UH-60 main transmission system consists of how many modules? Answer: 5 (five). ENABLING LEARNING OBJECTIVE B ACTION: Identify the characteristics of the UH-60 main transmission lubrication system components. CONDITIONS: Given multiple choices, visual representations of the UH-60 transmission lubrication system, and

From the New York Times bestselling authors of In the Company of Heroes comes a thrilling account of military aviation for history buffs and “for those who love vivid tales of battlefield heroics” (Publishers Weekly). In the world of covert warfare, Special Operations pilots are notoriously close-lipped about what they do. They don’t talk about their missions to anyone outside their small community. But now, Michael J. Durant and Steven Hartov shed fascinating light on the mysterious elite commandos known as SOAR (Special Operations Aviation Regiment) and take readers into a shadowy world of combat they have only imagined.

En beskrivelse af udviklingen af den amerikanske Utility helikoptertype UH-60 Black Hawk og dens mange anvendelsesmuligheder.

By applying Cohen and Gooch’s model to the Battle of Mogadishu, this paper shows that the failure of the TFR mission on 3-4 October 1993 was the result of a system failure. Secretary Aspin received far more blame than he deserved for making the decision. Misperception of the real impact tanks and APCs could have had on the overall mission is the real cause of this disproportionate blame. GEN Hoar and GEN Powell, in addition, bear as much responsibility as Secretary Aspin for the decision. Neither of these generals strongly advocated the deployment to Aspin even though the worsening situation on the ground merited their strong support. Both Hoar and Powell’s approval recommendations can be characterized as lukewarm. Aspin’s real failure was of not being more critical of the conduct of the TFR operations. In light of Secretary Aspin’s acknowledged concern over the number of similar operations conducted by TFR and his knowledge that the Administration was seeking a political solution, he should have notified MG Garrison of the policy shift though the JCS and CINCCENT and provided additional guidance on risk. Had Aspin either reassessed the risk of each TFR operation more thoroughly or done a better job coordinating the policy shift in light of the increased risks, it is likely that the three October raid would not have occurred.