The Scientific Monthly
Title | The Scientific Monthly PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | |
Pages | 608 |
Release | 1919 |
Genre | |
ISBN |
The Scientific Monthly
Title | The Scientific Monthly PDF eBook |
Author | James McKeen Cattell |
Publisher | |
Pages | 614 |
Release | 1920 |
Genre | Electronic journals |
ISBN |
The Scientific Journal
Title | The Scientific Journal PDF eBook |
Author | Alex Csiszar |
Publisher | University of Chicago Press |
Pages | 389 |
Release | 2018-06-25 |
Genre | Science |
ISBN | 022655337X |
Not since the printing press has a media object been as celebrated for its role in the advancement of knowledge as the scientific journal. From open communication to peer review, the scientific journal has long been central both to the identity of academic scientists and to the public legitimacy of scientific knowledge. But that was not always the case. At the dawn of the nineteenth century, academies and societies dominated elite study of the natural world. Journals were a relatively marginal feature of this world, and sometimes even an object of outright suspicion. The Scientific Journal tells the story of how that changed. Alex Csiszar takes readers deep into nineteenth-century London and Paris, where savants struggled to reshape scientific life in the light of rapidly changing political mores and the growing importance of the press in public life. The scientific journal did not arise as a natural solution to the problem of communicating scientific discoveries. Rather, as Csiszar shows, its dominance was a hard-won compromise born of political exigencies, shifting epistemic values, intellectual property debates, and the demands of commerce. Many of the tensions and problems that plague scholarly publishing today are rooted in these tangled beginnings. As we seek to make sense of our own moment of intense experimentation in publishing platforms, peer review, and information curation, Csiszar argues powerfully that a better understanding of the journal’s past will be crucial to imagining future forms for the expression and organization of knowledge.
Popular Science Monthly
Title | Popular Science Monthly PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | |
Pages | 940 |
Release | 1928 |
Genre | Science |
ISBN |
Yale Scientific Monthly
Title | Yale Scientific Monthly PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | |
Pages | 82 |
Release | 1907 |
Genre | Science |
ISBN |
The Scientific Imagination
Title | The Scientific Imagination PDF eBook |
Author | Arnon Levy |
Publisher | |
Pages | 361 |
Release | 2020 |
Genre | Philosophy |
ISBN | 0190212306 |
This book looks at the role of the imagination in science, from both philosophical and psychological perspectives. These contributions combine to provide a comprehensive and exciting picture of this under-explored subject.
Science
Title | Science PDF eBook |
Author | Patricia Fara |
Publisher | OUP Oxford |
Pages | 782 |
Release | 2010-02-11 |
Genre | Science |
ISBN | 0191655570 |
Science: A Four Thousand Year History rewrites science's past. Instead of focussing on difficult experiments and abstract theories, Patricia Fara shows how science has always belonged to the practical world of war, politics, and business. Rather than glorifying scientists as idealized heroes, she tells true stories about real people - men (and some women) who needed to earn their living, who made mistakes, and who trampled down their rivals in their quest for success. Fara sweeps through the centuries, from ancient Babylon right up to the latest hi-tech experiments in genetics and particle physics, illuminating the financial interests, imperial ambitions, and publishing enterprises that have made science the powerful global phenomenon that it is today. She also ranges internationally, illustrating the importance of scientific projects based around the world, from China to the Islamic empire, as well as the more familiar tale of science in Europe, from Copernicus to Charles Darwin and beyond. Above all, this four thousand year history challenges scientific supremacy, arguing controversially that science is successful not because it is always right - but because people have said that it is right.