Excerpt from The Canada Law Journal, 1915, Vol. 51 Beards v. Mopiera Colliery Co. Davies v. Burgess, In re Safl'ord. 441 Becker v. London Assurance Co.. 491 Davies v. James Bay Ry. Co. 103 Belanger v. Montreal Water and Dobson v. Horsley 321 Power Co. 62 Dorchester Electric. Co. V. The Be v.h11m111 Birk eh Permanent Building So Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre C.o v ciet, In te 237 New Garage and M. Co.. Blac ock v.1'earson 489 Ellis v. Cross Blakey v. Harrison. 489 Evangeline Fruit Co. V Provincial Board of Trim District. School v. Fire Insurance Co Kelly 100 Branchle v. Lloy d. 337 Farmer's Mart v. Milne. 329 British Columbia Electric R. Pernee v. Gorlitz 238 vanc011ver, victoria and 31131 F etters v. Croxton. 444 em R Finch v. Smith, In te Ainsworth 360 British ominions Ceneral insce.f1eetwood and D. E. L. P. Syn Cc. V. Duder 33, 364 dicate, In te British Electric vv. Gentile. 103 Flude v. Goldberg British R. C. B. Fund, v. Johnson, France Fenwick $81 Co. V. Met In te. 26 chants Marine Insce. France Fenwick Co. V. Mer Campbellford, etc. Ry. Co.v.ch11nts Marine Insurance Co.. 33 Mamie 110 Fratelli Sorenti no v. Buerger. 242, 490 Canadian Northei'n Ontario R. W. I Frontenac Gas Company v. The Co. V. Holditch.. 35 King Canadian Northern. Ry. Co. V Smith Canadian Pacific Ry. V.c11nadi11n Oil Co.. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Excerpt from The Canada Law Journal, 1919, Vol. 55 We have to recognize, much as we may perceive the danger connected with it, that the slogan of the day is the word Bemoe racy, that which Abraham Lincoln spoke of in his immortal speech at Gettysburg, when he said, We here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation, under God shall have a new birth of f tsedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Excerpt from The Canada Law Journal, 1917, Vol. 53 The attack on' Miller v: Hancock was carried further in Dobson v. Horsley (1915, 1 kb. Where a child of a tenant of a room had been injured through falling from a staircase, one of the rails of which was missing. It appeared that the railing was missing at the time of the letting of the room, and the fact that it was missing was obvious on inspection - at least to adults, if not to three-years-old playing with his toys. Hence Buckley, l.j., pointed out that there was no trap, and accordingly the child and his father, who were suing as co-plaintifls, had no remedy. Here, as in other cases subsequent to Miller v. Hancock, it was observed that that was a decision upon the facts of the particular case - a remark which applies just as much, perhaps, to all decisions. It is a maxim of case-law that each decision is concerned only with particular facts, and when it purports to establish a principle wider than the facts require, the excess is liable to be treated as obiter dictum. In fact, the idea of Miller v. Hancock being based on the trap doctrine seems to have been invented by subsequent judges who did not care to place the landlord's liability as high as seemed proper to the Court of Appeal in that case, and Dobson v. H orsley and Miller v. Hancock must be regarded as being in conflict. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Excerpt from The Canada Law Journal, 1868, Vol. 4: A Magazine of Jurisprudence The question raised in this case was the validity of an assignment made by an insol vent doing business in Sorel, to an official assignee appointed for the district Of Mon treal. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Excerpt from The Canada Law Journal, 1885, Vol. 21 Nelson, Re.. Newbould v. Smith. Newman v. Burnett Newman v. Newman. Nicol v. Nicol.. Nottingham Patent Brick Co. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Excerpt from The Canada Law Journal, Vol. 19: From January to December, 1883 This table furnishes an easy means of reference to the English and Canadian cases bearing on the present practice of our Courts, which have been noted and reported in the Notes of Cases and English Practice Cases in the law journal in this volume. The first column indicates the number of the section or rule Which is illustrated by a particular case (the rules being designated throughout by their margin 11 numbers), and the second column indicates the page in which the case in question is to be found. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.