This book is intended to provide practical guidance when considering issues of disclosure in criminal proceedings. It is aimed at both prosecution and defence practitioners. Disclosure issues can arise in any criminal case and in many guises, from the prosecution seeking an adverse inference from the defence's failure to set out their case in the defence statement, to the defence applying for proceedings to be stayed as an abuse of process due to disclosure failings by the prosecution. It also includes checklists designed to help the reader ask the right questions when considering particular disclosure topics along with a number of precedents, pro-formas and sample documents to assist. With a Foreword by Lord Justice Fulford (Sitting in Retirement). ABOUT THE AUTHORS Narita Bahra KC is one of the most sought after and able leading defence barristers instructed to defend in heavyweight Crime and Business Crime cases. She has been instructed in a number of the high-profile cases in which disclosure failings by the Prosecuting authorities have been unmasked. In 2018, four of these cases became the subject of review by the House of Commons Select Committee. Narita's most recent success resulted in her exposing an expert witness and significant disclosure failings. She has cemented a reputation as a barrister who can skilfully deal with the most difficult of disclosure cases. Her excellent track record, high success rate and commitment to fighting fearlessly for her client's best interests make her the leading choice in high profile disclosure cases. She regularly appears on Sky News and BBC news as a legal correspondent and is a regular author and contributor to legal journals. Don Ramble is a specialist prosecution barrister with 20 years' experience in the criminal courts. He has acted as disclosure counsel in some of the highest profile criminal trials in recent years, establishing himself as an expert in the field. His reputation and knowledge sees him called upon regularly to advise on disclosure issues in large and complex cases across the UK. CONTENTS Introduction Chapter One - Development of Disclosure Law Chapter Two - Terminology Chapter Three - Initial, Continuing and Post-Trial Disclosure Chapter Four - Defence Statements and Witness Notices Chapter Five - Disclosure Requests Chapter Six - Disclosure in the Magistrates' Court Chapter Seven - Digital Material Chapter Eight - Expert Witnesses Chapter Nine - Third-Party Material and Redaction Chapter Ten - PII Applications Chapter Eleven - Preventing Disclosure Problems Chapter Twelve - Tackling Disclosure Problems Chapter Thirteen - Remuneration

This book is intended to provide practical guidance when considering issues of disclosure in criminal proceedings. It is aimed at both prosecution and defence practitioners. Disclosure issues can arise in any criminal case and in many guises, from the prosecution seeking an adverse inference from the defence's failure to set out their case in the defence statement, to the defence applying for proceedings to be stayed as an abuse of process due to disclosure failings by the prosecution. It also includes checklists designed to help the reader ask the right questions when considering particular disclosure topics along with a number of precedents, pro-formas and sample documents to assist. With a Foreword by Sir Peter Gross (Lord Justice of Appeal). ABOUT THE AUTHORS Narita Bahra QC is one of the most sought after and able leading defence barristers instructed to defend in heavyweight Crime and Business Crime cases. She has been instructed in a number of the high-profile cases in which disclosure failings by the Prosecuting authorities have been unmasked. In 2018, four of these cases became the subject of review by the House of Commons Select Committee. Narita's most recent success resulted in her exposing an expert witness and significant disclosure failings. She has cemented a reputation as a barrister who can skilfully deal with the most difficult of disclosure cases. Her excellent track record, high success rate and commitment to fighting fearlessly for her client's best interests make her the leading choice in high profile disclosure cases. She regularly appears on Sky News and BBC news as a legal correspondent and is a regular author and contributor to legal journals. Don Ramble is a specialist prosecution barrister with 20 years' experience in the criminal courts. He has acted as disclosure counsel in some of the highest profile criminal trials in recent years, establishing himself as an expert in the field. His reputation and knowledge sees him called upon regularly to advise on disclosure issues in large and complex cases across the UK.

"Disclosure remains the most important part of trial preparation and can often make the difference between conviction and acquittal. The process can only work and produce fair results if all parties to the process are aware of their duties. The second edition of Criminal Disclosure Referencer (first edition: The Disclosure Referencer) provides practitioners with a practical, user-friendly guide to the law and guidance relating to the disclosure of unused material. The text follows the disclosure process chronologically from the commencement of the investigation to the conclusion of the case drawing together all the relevant legislation, codes, guidelines, rules, protocols and case law in a comprehensive manner, thereby enabling the reader to see quickly and effectively the duties and obligations of the main participants. Since the last edition of this work, the criminal justice landscape has changed fundamentally. The number of pre-trial hearings have been drastically reduced and replaced with a single 'Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing'. The principles of 'Better Case Management' have been introduced, requiring advocates to take more responsibility in relation to disclosure. In the vast majority of Crown Court cases evidence and disclosure are now provided digitally. All of these changes require parties to the criminal justice system to be fully up to date with their obligations in relation to disclosure. The second edition is updated to take account of numerous developments in legislation, case law and procedure including: Attorney General's Guidelines on Disclosure (updated October 2013) Judicial Protocol on the Disclosure of Unused Material in Criminal Cases (updated December 2013) Magistrates' Court Disclosure Review (June 2014) Revisions to the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act Codes of Practice as a result of the Magistrates' Court Disclosure Review Criminal Procedure Rules 2015 (incorporating digital case changeover) New codes of practice relating to Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (December 2014) The Covert Surveillance and Property Interference code of practice and the Covert Human Intelligence Source' code of practice (December 2014) The Interception of Communications code of practice (January 2016) Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2016 R. (on the application of Yam) v Central Criminal Court [2015] UKSC 76 - Whether there was a power under the common law, or under the Admin of Justice Act 1960 s12 to prevent an individual from placing certain material before the ECtHR. If so, whether the power could be exercised where the domestic court was satisfied that it was not in the interests of the State for the material to be made public even to the ECtHR R v Asiedu (Manfo Kwaku) [2015] EWCA Crim 714 R v Salt (Daryl) [2015] EWCA Crim 662R v Boardman (David) [2015] EWCA Crim 175 - Courts approach to failures in disclosure by Prosecution. R v R and others [2015] EWCA Crim 1941 - The Court of Appeal provided guidance on disclosure where large quantities of electronic documents are involved and on rulings as to abuse of process where delay has been caused by disclosure. R. (on the application of Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk [2014] UKSC 37 - Hugely significant case on the Crown's duty of disclosure post-conviction."--Bloomsbury Publishing.

eDisclosure is a hot topic for all practising lawyers in England and Wales. All those who run contentious business need to know how the courts are dealing with the complexities and problems that electronic disclosure throws up, and how they respond to the practical challenges discovered by firms in meeting the electronic disclosure protocol. Although the judiciary has offered guidance on the rules relating to eDisclosure for some time, the case law suggests that many lawyers remain blissfully unaware of three important topics: eDisclosure, eEvidence and eSignatures. This concise guide is intended as an aid to both lawyers and their technical advisers working on eDisclosure in England and Wales, and to indicate how judges have approached the issues arising in both civil and criminal proceedings. It will be of interest to all jurisdictions struggling with the same issues.

The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.

Scores of talented and dedicated people serve the forensic science community, performing vitally important work. However, they are often constrained by lack of adequate resources, sound policies, and national support. It is clear that change and advancements, both systematic and scientific, are needed in a number of forensic science disciplines to ensure the reliability of work, establish enforceable standards, and promote best practices with consistent application. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward provides a detailed plan for addressing these needs and suggests the creation of a new government entity, the National Institute of Forensic Science, to establish and enforce standards within the forensic science community. The benefits of improving and regulating the forensic science disciplines are clear: assisting law enforcement officials, enhancing homeland security, and reducing the risk of wrongful conviction and exoneration. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States gives a full account of what is needed to advance the forensic science disciplines, including upgrading of systems and organizational structures, better training, widespread adoption of uniform and enforceable best practices, and mandatory certification and accreditation programs. While this book provides an essential call-to-action for congress and policy makers, it also serves as a vital tool for law enforcement agencies, criminal prosecutors and attorneys, and forensic science educators.

This project addressed the admissibility of expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales. Currently, too much expert opinion evidence is admitted without adequate scrutiny because no clear test is being applied to determine whether the evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted. Juries may therefore be reaching conclusions on the basis of unreliable evidence, as confirmed by a number of miscarriages of justice in recent years. Following consultation on a discussion paper (LCCP 190, 2009, ISDBN 9780118404655) the Commission recommends that there should be a new reliability-based admissibility test for expert evidence in criminal proceedings. The test would not need to be applied routinely or unnecessarily, but it would be applied in appropriate cases and it would result in the exclusion of unreliable expert opinion evidence. Under the test, expert opinion evidence would not be admitted unless it was adjudged to be sufficiently reliable to go before a jury. The draft Criminal Evidence (Experts) Bill published with the report (as Appendix A) sets out the admissibility test and also provides the guidance judges would need when applying the test, setting out the key reasons why an expert's opinion evidence might be unreliable. The Bill also codifies (with slight modifications) the uncontroversial aspects of the present law, so that all the admissibility requirements for expert evidence would be set out in a single Act of Parliament and carry equal authority.