This March 2011 issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on such diverse topics as "preglimony," derivatives markets in a fiscal crisis, corporate reform in Brazil, land use and zoning under contract theory, and a student Note on college endowments at elite schools during a time of economic downturn. Contents for the March 2011 issue are: "Regulatory Dualism as a Development Strategy: Corporate Reform in Brazil, the U.S., and the E.U.," by Ronald J. Gilson, Henry Hansmann and Mariana Pargendler "The Derivatives Market's Payment Priorities as Financial Crisis Accelerator," by Mark J. Roe "The Contract Transformation in Land Use Regulation," by Daniel P. Selmi "Preglimony," by Shari Motro Note, "Scarcity Amidst Wealth: The Law, Finance, and Culture of Elite University Endowments in Financial Crisis" In the ebook editions, the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scalable, and functional; the original note numbering is retained; URLs in notes are active; and the issue is properly formatted.

A leading law journal features a digital edition as part of its worldwide distribution, using quality ebook formatting and active links. The March 2012 issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community. Contents for the March 2012 issue include: Prosecuting the Exonerated: Actual Innocence and the Double Jeopardy Clause; By Jordan M. Barry From Multiculturalism to Technique: Feminism, Culture, and the Conflict of Laws Style; By Karen Knop, Ralf Michaels & Annelise Riles Fragmentation Nodes: A Study in Financial Innovation, Complexity, and Systemic Risk; By Kathryn Judge Note: Insurmountable Obstacles: Structural Errors, Procedural Default, and Ineffective Assistance; By Amy Knight Burns Comment: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility and the Deepwater Horizon Litigation: Judicial Regulation of Private Compensation Schemes; By Colin McDonell In the ebook edition, all the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scalable, and functional; the original note numbering is retained. Also, the URLs in notes are active; and the issue is properly formatted.

The Stanford Law Review is published six times a year by students of the Stanford Law School. Each issue contains material written by student members of the Law Review, other Stanford law students, and outside contributors, such as law professors, judges, and practicing lawyers. The current volume is 63, for the academic year 2010-2011, and the present compilation, in ebook form, represents Issue 6, June 2011. The present issue is a special Symposium, featuring cutting-edge articles on patent law and the IP issues related to genetic and biotech innovation and business methods after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bilski.

One of the leading and most-read law journals adds multiple digital editions to its worldwide distribution. This current issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by scholars Ryan Scott (on sentencing disparity), Scott Hershovitz (what Harry Potter means to torts), Robert Cooter & Neil Siegel (collective federalism), and Brian Galle & Jonathan Klick (alternative minimum tax). Volume 63, Issue 1's contents include: "Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity After Booker: A First Look," by Ryan W. Scott "Harry Potter and the Trouble with Tort Theory," by Scott Hershovitz "Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8," by Robert D. Cooter & Neil S. Siegel "Recessions and the Social Safety Net: The Alternative Minimum Tax as a Countercyclical Fiscal Stabilizer," by Brian Galle & Jonathan Klick

This issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, history, and social policy by recognized scholars on such diverse topics as fixing unfair contracts (by Omri Ben-Shahar), using DNA forensics to identify family members in criminal cases and other legal matters (by Natalie Ram), and the ethics of lawyers holding onto real evidence such as guns,tapes, and drugs (by Stephen Gillers). In addition, extensive student work explores the history of religious freedom and the First Amendment, as well as the use of amicus curiae briefs in the Supreme Court after an opinion below is abandoned by a party. The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948. Each year the Law Review publishes one volume, which appears in six separate issues between December and July. Each issue contains material written by student members of the Law Review, other Stanford law students, and outside contributors, such as law professors, judges, and practicing lawyers. The current volume is 63, for the academic year 2010-2011, and the present compilation, in ebook form, represents Issue 4 for April 2011. In the ebook editions, all footnotes, graphs, and Tables of Contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scaled, and functional; the original note numbering is retained; and the issue is properly formatted.

A leading law journal features a digital edition as part of its worldwide distribution, using quality ebook formatting and active links. This issue of the Stanford Law Review, Volume 64, Issue 4 - April 2012, contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community. Contents for this issue include: -- The Tragedy of the Carrots: Economics and Politics in the Choice of Price Instruments, by Brian Galle -- “They Saw a Protest”: Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction, by Dan M. Kahan, David A. Hoffman, Donald Braman, Danieli Evans & Jeffrey J. Rachlinski -- Constitutional Design in the Ancient World, by Adriaan Lanni & Adrian Vermeule -- The Copyright-Innovation Tradeoff: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Intentional Infliction of Harm, by Dotan Oliar -- Note, Testing Three Commonsense Intuitions About Judicial Conduct Commissions -- Note, Derivatives Clearinghouses and Systemic Risk: A Bankruptcy and Dodd-Frank Analysis In the ebook edition, all the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scalable, and functional; the original note numbering is retained. Also, the URLs in notes are active; and the issue is properly formatted.

Stanford Law Review's fifth issue of 2011 features scholarly article by scholars and Stanford students. This issue's contents are: ARTICLES "The Objects of the Constitution," Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz "The Lost Origins of American Fair Employment Law: Regulatory Choice and the Making of Modern Civil Rights, 1943-1972," David Freeman Engstrom NOTES "Measuring the Effects of Specialization with Circuit Split Resolutions" "The Substance of Punishment Under the Bill of Attainder Clause" "Plenary No Longer: How the Fourteenth Amendment 'Amended' Congressional Jurisdiction-Stripping Power"