The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.

Settlement risk is a critical concern in all financial markets and especially so in foreign exchange markets where it poses the threat of complete loss. In this paper, we offer a historical look at how risk mitigation in FX settlement has developed over time. We rely on two surveys conducted by the BIS in 1997 and 2007 and a new survey conducted by CLS Bank in April 2013. Based on our review of the evidence, we find that the market has achieved significant progress in both developing and implementing techniques that have dramatically reduced exposure to FX settlement risk. The share of FX turnover settled by means of traditional correspondent bank arrangements has declined from 85% to 32% to 13% across the three surveys. CLS Bank which offers payment-versus-payment (PVP) settlement and virtually eliminates settlement risk now settles roughly half of all FX turnover. However, because of enormous growth in FX turnover, particularly in emerging market currencies where access to risk mitigation alternatives is less prevalent, the absolute value of FX turnover exposed to settlement risk remains large. Surprisingly, one-quarter of FX turnover in currencies eligible for PVP settlement using CLS Bank still relies on bilateral settlement with some exposure to settlement risk. These findings support the need for banks, industry groups and central banks to remain vigilant and continue their efforts to incentivize PVP settlement positively, making it widely available and utilized, or finding alternative risk mitigating solutions. We offer various approaches to deal with the remaining settlement risk.