Le nucléaire est un sujet tabou en France. Qu'il s'agisse de la sécurité des centrales, du coût réel de cette énergie ou des contraintes qu'elle fait peser sur notre démocratie, l'opacité règne. Mais depuis, il y a eu Fukushima. Cette catastrophe a tout changé : que se passerait-il en France si un accident similaire se produisait ? Sommes-nous vraiment préparés à ce type d'événement ? Quel est le poids du lobby nucléaire ?En présentant tous les arguments, Corinne Lepage, ancienne ministre de l'Environnement, députée européenne et avocate spécialisée dans les dossiers liés à l'énergie, répond aux légitimes questions que se pose désormais l'opinion.Un document à la fois très fort, très argumenté, qui évite les procès d'intention et ouvre un débat longtemps interdit.

This book offers the first non-official history of French nuclear policies which goes beyond the divide between nuclear weapons and nuclear energy policies. It addresses the sizing of France’s nuclear forces, technological assistance to countries with nuclear weapons programs, uranium prospection, nuclear testing, its health effects and protests against it, as well as plans to prevent and manage accidents in nuclear power plants. It is based on new questions and new sources from France and abroad. The chapters in this volume show how independent and interdisciplinary scholarship free from conflicts of interests can uniquely advance our understanding of nuclear history and politics. This is the case because it does not treat the categories and judgments of official discourse as neutral starting points of the analysis. This volume is based on untapped primary sources from France, the UK, the US, India, South Africa and Iran, on a new assessment of the health consequences of French nuclear testing in Polynesia thanks to a modern atmospheric particle transport code coupled with historical weather data, open-source information about radioactive debris (“mushroom”) clouds, as well as data on the composition and particle sizes of the fallout; and on new survey data about French knowledge of and attitudes towards nuclear weapons and nuclear energy. They show notably that the first generation of French nuclear forces lacked technical credibility despite reliance on outside help. Several French officials knew this, as did France's allies and adversaries. Moreover, French strategic collaborations associated to nuclear programs extended to India and South Africa; nuclear safety regulations changed fundamentally after the Cold War, and approximately 110,000 people, i.e. 90% of the French Polynesian population in the 1970s, could have received doses that would qualify them for compensation according to French law. The volume will be of interest to scholars and students of history, politics, international relations, military history, war studies, conflict and global governance. Most of the chapters in this book were originally published as a special issue in Cold War History. A few chapters were first published in the Nonproliferation Review, Diplomacy & Statecraft and Science & Global Security.

À en croire les propos du président de la République et de nos diplomates, la politique de défense nucléaire française ne fait pas débat. Le choix est fait : celui d’un monde désormais structuré par la prolifération nucléaire. Ce choix repose sur trois composantes : validité de la politique de dissuasion, absence de risque grâce à un contrôle adéquat de notre arsenal, responsabilité morale et politique sans faille du chef de l’Etat, habilité à déclencher le feu nucléaire. En démocratie, est-il acceptable que ce choix ne soit pas questionné ?Benoît Pelopidas montre la fragilité de ces présupposés et ouvre ainsi le choix des possibles. Benoît Pelopidas est titulaire de la chaire d'excellence en études de sécurité de Sciences Po (Centre de recherches internationales, CERI) et chercheur affilié au Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) de l'Université Stanford.

The most powerful military alliance in history, NATO shaped the geopolitical contours of the Cold War and continues to structure the contemporary international system. The NATO agreement is reprinted here with speeches and essential historical documents concerning the alliance’s founding and subsequent evolution. Accompanying essays by major scholars discuss debates about NATO’s evolving governance, its role in nuclear politics, and its appropriate mission during and since the Cold War.