Essay from the year 2021 in the subject Law - Public Law / Constitutional Law / Basic Rights, grade: A, , language: English, abstract: The main topic of this paper is to frame a critique of the so-called partnership model in jurisdiction between the legislature and the judiciary- The hallmark of 19th and 20th century doctrines of interpretation has been that they premise themselves on the principle that a court ought to interpret law as it stands. The function of the court is to interpret the language of a statute, whereas it is for the legislature to make enactments and for the courts to enforce such enactments. Courts are not legislators, they have to carry out loyally the directions of the legislature. Two models of interpretation stands in present world, agency and partnership model. According to the agency model while interpreting a statute, the Court has to discover the intent of the legislature or the purpose behind legislation. The partnership model views the Court as a partner in legislative enterprise with legislature, hence, while interpreting a statute the Court should seek a sensible to avoid rigors of law. Judge does not create normative text but rather gives it meaning. The static vision of statutory interpretation prescribed by traditional doctrine is strikingly outdated. Interpretation of a statute evolves over time because of changing factual contexts and the changing perspectives of its interpreters. Statutory interpretation should appropriately balance a number of factors, including predictability and certainty, economic efficiency, fairness, and the public interest.

Stephen Gardbaum proposes and examines a new way of protecting rights in a democracy.

The Model Legislative Provisions and the Legislative Guide on Public-Private Partnerships were prepared by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and adopted at its fifty-second session (Vienna, 8-19 July 2019). In addition to representatives of member States of the Commission, representatives of many other States and of several international organizations, both intergovernmental and non-governmental, participated actively in the preparatory work. The Model Legislative Provisions translate into legislative language the advice given in the recommendations contained in the Legislative Guide. The Model Legislative Provisions are intended to assist in the establishment of a legislative framework favourable to public-private partnerships (PPPs). The Model Legislative Provisions follow the corresponding notes in the Legislative Guide, which offer an analytical introduction with references to financial, regulatory, legal, policy and other issues raised in the subject area. The user is advised to read the Model Legislative Provisions together with the Legislative Guide, which provide background information to enhance understanding of the legislative recommendations. The Model Legislative Provisions deal with matters that it is important to address in legislation specifically concerned with PPPs. They do not deal with other areas of law that, as discussed in the Legislative Guide, also have an impact on PPPs. Moreover, the successful implementation of PPPs typically requires various measures beyond the establishment of an appropriate legislative framework, such as adequate administrative structures and practices, organizational capability, technical expertise, appropriate human and financial resources and economic stability.

Most major measures wind their way through the contemporary Congress in what Barbara Sinclair has dubbed “unorthodox lawmaking.” In this much-anticipated Fifth Edition of Unorthodox Lawmaking, Sinclair explores the full range of special procedures and processes that make up Congress’s work, as well as the reasons these unconventional routes evolved. The author introduces students to the intricacies of Congress and provides the tools to assess the relative successes and limitations of the institution. This dramatically updated revision incorporates a wealth of new cases and examples to illustrate the changes occurring in congressional process. Two entirely new case study chapters—on the 2013 government shutdown and the 2015 reauthorization of the Patriot Act—highlight Sinclair’s fresh analysis and the book is now introduced by a new foreword from noted scholar and teacher, Bruce I. Oppenheimer, reflecting on this book and Barbara Sinclair’s significant mark on the study of Congress.

Legislatures are arguably the most important political institution in modern democracies. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, written by some of the most distinguished legislative scholars in political science, provides a comprehensive and up-to-date description and critical assessment of the state of the art in this key area.

This work provides a rational framework for legislation. The unifying premise behind the essays is that, although legislation and regulation are the result of a political process, legislation and regulation can be the object of theoretical study. The volume focuses on problems that are common to most European legal systems and the approach involves applying to legislative problems the tools of legal theory - hence 'legisprudence'. Whereas traditional legal theory deals predominantly with the application of law by the judge, legisprudence enlarges the field of study so as to include the creation of law by the legislator. The original essays published in this collection expose and develop a range of new insights into the relationship between legislative problems and legal theory in a way which will engage and interest legal scholars throughout the world.