"La responsabilidad del artista" suscitó en el momento de su publicación en Francia una fuerte y, en algunos momentos, crispada polémica. Es, en efecto, un libro polémico, provocador, pero no un texto anecdótico. Los problemas que plantea, el "perfil político" del arte de vanguardia, la posibilidad de interpretar el vanguardismo en un sentido profundamente distinto del habitual, la tensión del arte del siglo xx entre el terror y la razón, su eventual carácter totalitario, son algunos de los motivos que se analizan aquí, con claridad y con pasión. No es la primera vez que un trabajo de Jean Clair suscita pasiones. Sucedió con su exposición Les réalismes (1981) y, más recientemente, con la exposición organizada en la Bienal de Venecia (1995) con motivo de su centenario. En un tiempo en el que, tal como sucede hoy, se procede a una revisión de los tópicos de la historia del arte del siglo xx, la posición de Clair contribuye de forma decisiva a perfilar un punto de vista original, fecundo, capaz de renovar las pautas de la historiografía artística.

Carlos Fuentes (1928–2012) was the most prominent novelist in contemporary Mexico and, until his recent death, one of the leading voices in Latin America’s Boom generation. He received the most prestigious awards and prizes in the world, including the Latin Civilization Award (presented by the Presidents of Brazil, Mexico, and France), the Miguel de Cervantes Prize, and the Prince of Asturias Award. During his fecund and accomplished life as a writer, literary theorist, and political analyst, Fuentes turned his attention to the major conflicts of the twentieth century – from the Second World War and the Cuban Revolution, to the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, the war in Vietnam, and the post-revolutionary crisis of the one-party rule in Mexico – and attended to their political and international importance in his novels, short fiction, and essays. Known for his experimentation in narrative techniques, and for novels and essays written in a global range that illuminate the conflicts of our times, Fuentes’s writings have been rightfully translated into most of the world’s languages. His literary work continues to spur and provoke the interest of a global readership on diverse civilizations and eras, from Imperial Spain and post-revolutionary France, to Ancient and Modern Mexico, the United States, and Latin America. The Reptant Eagle: Essays on Carlos Fuentes and the Art of the Novel includes nineteen essays and one full introduction written exclusively for this volume by renowned Fuentes scholars from Asia, Europe, the United States, and Latin America. Collected into five parts, the essays integrate wide-ranging methods and innovative readings of The Death of Artemio Cruz (1962), Aura (1962), Terra Nostra (1975) and, among other novels, Distant Relations (1980); they analyze the visual arts in Fuentes’s novels (Diego Rivera’s murals and world film); chart and comment on the translations of Fuentes’s narratives into Japanese and Romanian; and propose comprehensive readings of The Buried Mirror (1992) and Personas (2012), Fuentes’s posthumous book of essays. Beyond their comprehensive and interdisciplinary scope, the book’s essays trace Fuentes’s conscious resolve to contribute to the art of the novel and to its uninterrupted tradition, from Cervantes and Rabelais to Thomas Mann and Alejo Carpentier, and from the Boom generation to Latin America’s “Boomerang” group of younger writers. This book will be of importance to literary critics, teachers, students, and readers interested in Carlos Fuentes’s world-embracing literary work.

Cuban author Alejo Carpentier (1904-1980) was a key figure in the foundation of contemporary Latin American fiction. By taking a critical position vis-a-vis the restitutionary current in Latin American studies, James Pancrazio provides a highly innovative re-reading of Carpentier's work.

Grounded in painstaking research, To Defend the Revolution Is to Defend Culture revisits the circumstances which led to the arts being embraced at the heart of the Cuban Revolution. Introducing the main protagonists to the debate, this previously untold story follows the polemical twists and turns that ensued in the volatile atmosphere of the 1960s and ’70s. The picture that emerges is of a struggle for dominance between Soviet-derived approaches and a uniquely Cuban response to the arts under socialism. The latter tendency, which eventually won out, was based on the principles of Marxist humanism. As such, this book foregrounds emancipatory understandings of culture. To Defend the Revolution Is to Defend Culture takes its title from a slogan – devised by artists and writers at a meeting in October 1960 and adopted by the First National Congress of Writers and Artists the following August – which sought to highlight the intrinsic importance of culture to the Revolution. Departing from popular top-down conceptions of Cuban policy-formation, this book establishes the close involvement of the Cuban people in cultural processes and the contribution of Cuba’s artists and writers to the policy and praxis of the Revolution. Ample space is dedicated to discussions that remain hugely pertinent to those working in the cultural field, such as the relationship between art and ideology, engagement and autonomy, form and content. As the capitalist world struggles to articulate the value of the arts in anything other than economic terms, this book provides us with an entirely different way of thinking about culture and the policies underlying it.

(fragmento del prólogo del autor): AB OVO O INCOACIÓN PENSANDO EN Los desafortunados DE B.S. JOHNSON QUE ENCERRADO EN UNA CAJA DE BRONCE SE SUICIDÓ EN 1973 PORQUE, COMO ÉL DIJO, YA HABÍA ESCRITO TODO LO QUE TENÍA QUE ESCRIBIR [...] POR ESTO B.S. JOHNSON PUSO FIN A LA FICCIÓN Y ABANDÓ LA VIDA; O ALEJANDRA PIZARNIK QUE EN LA MADRUGADA DEL 25 DE SEPTIEMBRE DE 1972, ESCRIBIENDO EN SU PIZARRA NEGRA Y DE PERFIL MIRANDO EL CABALLO PARA LA PORTADA DE SU LIBRO Nombres y figuras, SÍ, EN AQUELLA MADRUGADA DEJÓ DE ESCRIBIR Y DE MIRAR EL CABALLO QUE DIBUJÉ PARA ELLA; O EDWARD STACHURA QUE EL 3 DE MARZO DE 1978 ME ESCRIBIÓ DESDE LA RUE DES VINAIGRIERS, DE PARÍS, PIDIÉNDOME CONVIVIR CONMIGO EN UN RINCÓN DE MI ESTUDIO DEL CARRER DELS CÒDOLS (YO LE CONTESTÉ A VUELTA DE CORREO QUE SÍ, QUE PODÍA VENIR); PERO PASARON LOS DÍAS Y HOY TODAVÍA LO ESTOY ESPERANDO: ÉL REGRESÓ A POLONIA Y EL 24 DE JULIO DE 1979 EN WARSZAWA DIJO ADIÓS A LA VIDA POR PROPIA VOLUNTAD. EN FIN, ESTE AB OVO O INCOACIÓN ES EL TÍTULO GENERAL PARA VISITAR Y LEER LAS PÁGINAS CON LAS QUE ARRANCA LA NARRACIÓN Diario de un artista suicida.?