This bulletin contains abstracts of the addresses delivered at a two-day conference of State and county rural-school supervisors in the Southeastern States, called by the United States Commissioner of Education, at Peabody College for Teachers, Nashville, Tennessee, December 14 and 15, 1925. Abstracts were prepared from notes or manuscripts submitted by the authors. The conference was attended by approximately 100 rural educational workers, most of whom are engaged in State and county supervision. The States represented are Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. The United States Bureau of Education was represented by two members of the staff of the Division of Rural Education. The Program presented at the conference was arranged to consider the six large problems indicated by the Roman numerals in the table of contents: (I) The Supervision of Instruction; (II) Teaching Problems; (III) The Value of Supervisory Plans and Programs; (IV) Intelligent Use of the Textbook; (V) Problems Concerned with the Course of Study and Its Use; and (VI) Equitable Distribution of the Supervisor's Time. Under each of these at least one major paper or address was presented, followed by free discussion from the floor. Individual abstracts contain tables and footnotes. [Prepared in the Division of Rural Education. Best copy available has been provided.].

Supervision as understood in well-organized city systems has little resemblance to the annual visitation of schools as practiced by many county or other rural superintendents. The majority of these officers are fully conscious of the limitations imposed upon them by the conditions under which they work and they are active in their efforts to improve them. Popular election is still the prevailing method of selection (See p. 26). Short or uncertain tenure, long distances to travel in reaching isolated schools, the excessive number of teachers per supervisor, and executing administrative duties, all combine to make the officer more of a visitor, and less of a superintendent. The statutory provision that the "county superintendent shall visit each school at least once a year," very common among states, seems to indicate that the conditions mentioned are or have been in harmony with the popular conception of the duties of the office. Increasingly, each year, the convictions in rural communities is that the immediate hope for improvement of the schools in the open country is through professional supervision. The teaching force is made up in large part of unprepared, inexperienced, and immature teachers. There is little indication at present that this will change materially within the next five years. Even if adequate provisions for completely changing the situation were immediately initiated and steadily pursued, its accomplishment would require at least that time. Justice to the children now in school demands a more immediate remedy. Professional supervision is the best way employed to give teachers with little experience and preparation a professional outlook and some training in the principles and use of modern methods of classroom organization and teaching. It is generally conceded that no adequate provision for supervision has been made in the past nor is now being made in those States in which the administration and supervision of a large number of rural schools, widely separated, are entrusted to one officer. This officer is usually a county superintendent, or one whose duties correspond to those of such an officer. The administrative organization in vogue in the majority of the States, particularly in those organized on the small district unit basis neither provides for supervision definitely nor lends itself readily to such provision on the part of the school officers. It is also true that the difficulty does not end when supervisors are provided. The whole subject of methods of supervision in rural school systems, organization of small schools, courses of study adapted to rural life, as well as difficulties inherent in open-country conditions which supervisors must overcome, present new and unsolved problems. Successful methods of procedure, while established in many communities, are not generally understood or widely practiced. There are not enough supervisors with the preparation and experience necessary for success, to fill positions which are now becoming available. Information concerning effective methods followed by rural supervisors is therefore of equal interest to that concerning their appointment. Because of these facts it is believed that a description of plans followed in certain sections of the country where supervision is established will be suggestive and helpful. That children on the farms and in the open country have advantages of a school education in some measure at least equivalent to those now enjoyed by children in cities is a matter of justice which should not be overlooked. Since professional supervision is an effective means to that end; it is a matter of supreme concern to all those who are interested in improving rural schools. The table of contents divides this bulletin into two parts: Part 1, General Provisions Concerning Supervision, Superintendents, and Supervisors; and Part 2, Methods of Supervising Rural Schools as Practiced in Five States. Appended are: (1) County departments of education of the various States' staff and salary; and (2) Forms used in the supervision of rural schools in certain counties in Connecticut, New Jersey, and Illinois. (Contains 18 tables; individual chapters contain footnotes.) [Best copy available has been provided.].