Hearing to review pending climate legislation : hearing before the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, June 11, 2009.

Hearing to review pending climate legislation: hearing before the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, June 11, 2009.

Excerpt from Pending Nuclear Legislation: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Regulation of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session You specifically asked about the standards and before I comment on that I'd like to say that the standard In your bill IS not the kind of standard that's in Heckler v. Chaney. When they say a bill 15 not reviewable unless there is an objective standard - they' re talking about procedural standards, so the judges can take a look to see if the agency has carried out its own procedures. The standard that you have set out in your draft Is the substantive standard - it says here are the kinds of things, from a safety point of view, that should be looked at. We have no problem with the standards that you've set out. On a more technical nature, we would not like the review ability to just be able to say that the petition should be granted because in many cases petitions ask for remedies that are far in excess of the problem at hand. So, even if there were review ability, that bill should just call for the nrc to have the hearing, not necessarily to grant the remedy. That's a small technical point. In summary, we understand the reason for the bill. We think that we did operate for years in an area of judicial review ability and there were very few cases taken to court. We don't think there would be a practical impact in the sense of more petitions being found valid and there would be somewhat of an increase in costs just to handle the review points. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

The Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873)