In the context of a growing population in an already densely populated area, agricultural yields will need to increase without putting additional stress on the environment. The adoption of modern inputs by smallholders is an important ingredient of agricultural transformation. In this study we explore plot-level, household-level, and institutional-level characteristics associated with agricultural technology adoption behavior among smallholder farmers. The aim is to uncover correlations that can guide the design of policies and incentives that are likely to increase adoption. We explicitly differentiate between fixed costs that are likely to affect the decision to use the technology and variable costs that are more relevant for the decision regarding use intensity. In addition, we examine how the importance of each of these characteristics differs with asset status. To do so, we use data from about 1,880 potato plots cultivated by 500 randomly selected potato growers in southwestern Uganda. We first categorize households into poorly endowed and well-endowed asset classes based on their access to productive assets. We then estimate double-hurdle models for take-up and use intensity of fertilizer for each group. The results show that the factors associated with the decision to use fertilizer are often different from those associated with the decision about how much fertilizer to use and that the characteristics correlated with fertilizer adoption differ between asset-poor and asset-rich farmers. For instance, asset-poor female-headed households are less likely to use fertilizer, but if they do, they use more of it than male-headed households. Our results also suggest fertilizer packaging and distribution are important factors in fertilizer adoption decisions due to their impact on costs related to both indivisibilities and uncertainty about the quality. We derive a range of policy recommendations.

To feed a growing and increasingly urbanized population, Uganda needs to increase crop production without further exhausting available resources. Therefore, smallholder farmers are encouraged to adopt sustainable crop intensification methods such as inorganic fertilizer or hybrid seeds. However, these farmers perceive these new technologies as risky hence adoption will depend on how well they can manage this additional risk. This paper documents patterns observed in socioeconomic data that suggest risk is an important barrier to sustainable crop intensification practices among Ugandan smallholder rice and potato farmers. In particular, we find that households that engage in risk management strategies, such as investing in risk-reducing technology or engaging in precautionary savings, are more likely to practice intensified cropping. However, our data also show only limited yield risk associated with the use of fertilizers or pesticides, suggesting part of the problem is related to perception. We also discuss the consequences for policy.

To feed a growing and increasingly urbanized population, Uganda needs to increase crop production without further exhausting available resources. Therefore, smallholder farmers are encouraged to adopt sustainable crop intensification methods such as inorganic fertilizer or hybrid seeds. However, as farmers perceive these new technologies as risky, adoption will depend on how well they can manage this additional risk. This brief documents patterns observed in socioeconomic data that suggest risk is indeed an important barrier to sustainable crop intensification practices among Ugandan smallholder rice and potato farmers. In particular, we find that households that engage in risk management strategies, such as investing in risk-reducing technology or engaging in precautionary savings, are more likely to practice intensified cropping. However, our data also show only limited downside yield risk associated with the use of fertilizers or pesticides, suggesting part of the problem is related to perception. We conclude with some policy options derived from these findings.

Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are projected to be the second breadbasket of the world, behind the United States (Chahed, 2018). With a rising global population increased food and fiber, production is imminent (FAO, 2015). Literature suggests that agricultural input (i.e. fertilizers) adoption will lead to an increase in agricultural production in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries (Barrett & Sheahan, 2017). As agricultural scientists and producers continue to search for methods to feed the growing global population, Uganda has been overlooked as a country with only 3.2% of its farming population having adopted mineral fertilizers (Barrett & Sheahan, 2017). With a limited understanding as to why farmers in Uganda have yet to adopt input innovations, there is a need to examine 1) What Ugandan farmers' experiences are regarding the adoption or rejection of mineral fertilizers and 2) How mineral fertilizers can be integrated into the Ugandan culture of social norms to increase adoption. phenomenological inquiry was employed to better understand the experiences and relationships among fertilizer use and farmers' perceived barriers. Thirty farmers were interviewed in Uganda following phenomenological research design. The data were analyzed by (give some details here). According to participants and the observations of the research team, the essence of using mineral fertilizers according to the Ugandan farmers was that of the endless ladder. Farmers are unable to use fertilizers due to a series of poverty traps caused by several factors including, 1) high costs to purchase the input, 2) inability to access fertilizers from the market, and, 3) a lack of knowledge and training regarding fertilizer application rates and timing. The essence of high-hanging fruit was used to inform recommendations for the establishment of an original model that outlines recommended interventions for in-country extension and outreach organizations such as Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO's), non-profits and the International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC) to facilitate the adoption of mineral fertilizers among Ugandan farmers.

Agriculture is an urgent global priority and farmers find themselves in the front line of some of the world's most pressing issues- climate change, globalization and food security. Twenty years ago, the Farmer First workshop held at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, UK, launched a movement to encourage farmer participation in agricultural research and development (R & D), responding to farmers' needs in complex, diverse, risk-prone environments, and promoting sustainable livelihoods and agriculture. Since that time, methodological, institutional and policy experiments have unfolded around the world. Farmer First Revisited returns to the debates about farmer participation in agricultural R & D and looks to the future.The book presents a range of experiences that highlight the importance of going beyond a focus on the farm to a wider innovation system, including market interactions as well as the wider institutional and policy environment. If, however, farmers are really to be put first, a politics of demand is required in order to shape the direction of these innovative systems.

The potato has the potential to raise smallholder income and improve food security in Eastern Africa. While improving the quality of seed potatoes can contribute to increasing its productivity, most farmers largely rely on the seed potatoes they save themselves. Seed potato system interventions need to address the quality of specially multiplied and farm-saved seed potatoes simultaneously. This book shows that positive selectionthe selection of healthy looking mother plants for the production of seed potatoes by aware potato farmerscan contribute to improving seed potato quality and the quality of the subsequent harvest.