Evaluation Research and Agricultural Development
Title | Evaluation Research and Agricultural Development PDF eBook |
Author | Sadok Driss |
Publisher | |
Pages | 472 |
Release | 1986 |
Genre | Agricultural development projects |
ISBN |
National Agricultural Research
Title | National Agricultural Research PDF eBook |
Author | United Nations Development Programme |
Publisher | Food & Agriculture Org. |
Pages | 116 |
Release | 1984 |
Genre | Political Science |
ISBN | 9789251014646 |
Evaluative Research for Agricultural Development Projects
Title | Evaluative Research for Agricultural Development Projects PDF eBook |
Author | Kenneth Gustaf Swanberg |
Publisher | |
Pages | 48 |
Release | 1981 |
Genre | Agricultural development projects |
ISBN |
Evaluation Research and Agricultural Development
Title | Evaluation Research and Agricultural Development PDF eBook |
Author | Driss Sadok |
Publisher | |
Pages | 236 |
Release | 1989 |
Genre | |
ISBN |
Results-based Monitoring and Evaluation for Organizations Working in Agricultural Development
Title | Results-based Monitoring and Evaluation for Organizations Working in Agricultural Development PDF eBook |
Author | Berhanu Gebremedhin |
Publisher | ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD) |
Pages | 74 |
Release | 2010-01-01 |
Genre | Agricultural development projects |
ISBN | 9291462454 |
Innovation Platforms for Agricultural Development
Title | Innovation Platforms for Agricultural Development PDF eBook |
Author | Iddo Dror |
Publisher | Routledge |
Pages | 221 |
Release | 2015-12-22 |
Genre | Technology & Engineering |
ISBN | 1317296141 |
Innovation Platforms (IPs) form the core of many Agricultural Research for Development programmes, stimulating multi-stakeholder collaboration and action towards the realization of agricultural development outcomes. This book enhances the body of knowledge of IPs by focusing on mature IPs in agricultural systems research, including the crop and livestock sectors, and innovations in farmer cooperatives and agricultural extension services. Resulting from an international IP case study competition, the examples reported will help the many actors involved with agricultural IPs worldwide reflect on their actions and achievements (or failures), and find tools to share their experience. Chapters feature case studies from Central Africa, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Nicaragua and Uganda. Authors reflect critically on the impact of IPs and showcase their progress, providing an important sourcebook and inspiration for students, researchers and professionals.
Improving the proof: Evolution of and emerging trends in impact assessment methods and approaches in agricultural development
Title | Improving the proof: Evolution of and emerging trends in impact assessment methods and approaches in agricultural development PDF eBook |
Author | Mywish K. Maredia |
Publisher | Intl Food Policy Res Inst |
Pages | 48 |
Release | |
Genre | Social Science |
ISBN |
Assessing impacts of public investments has long captured the interest and attention of the development community. This paper presents the evolution of different methods and approaches used for ex ante appraisal, monitoring, project evaluation, and impact assessment over the last five decades. Among these tools, impact assessment (IA) conducted retrospectively comes closest to providing the proof of development effectiveness. It is defined as the systematic analysis of the significant or lasting changes in people's lives brought about by a given action or series of actions in relation to a counterfactual. There are three basic types of retrospective IAs: macro-level IAs that focus on the contribution of developmental efforts to an impact goal aggregated at a sector or a system level; micro-level impact evaluations (IEs) concerned with estimating the average effect of an intervention on outcomes at the beneficiary level; and micro-level ex post impact analysis concerned with total effects of a development effort after the outputs are scaled-up. Ex post IAs have evolved and expanded over the decades in both breadth and depth of analysis in response to evolving development themes and methodological advancements. The increased emphasis on learning from evaluations has also seen responses from both quantitative and qualitative camps of the evaluation community. The paper argues that generation of robust knowledge that feeds into making developmental policies and investment decisions requires a hierarchical and cumulative approach to "improving the proof" through rigorous and a variety of impact assessment methods applied incrementally at the project, program and system level. Subjecting as many development interventions as resources allow to rigorous impact assessment based on a common framework can help build a critical body of evidence on impacts of development interventions, which can then be subjected to meta-analyses to help assimilate results across different studies and build a knowledge base on what works and what does not.