Variable advisory speed limit (VASL) systems could be effective at both urban and rural work zones, at both uncongested and congested sites. At uncongested urban work zones, the average speeds with VASL were lower than without VASL. But the standard deviation of speeds with VASL was higher. The increase in standard deviation may be due to the advisory nature of VASL. The speed limit compliance with VASL was about eight times greater than without VASL. At the congested sites, the VASL were effective in making drivers slow down gradually as they approached the work zone, reducing any sudden changes in speeds. Mobility-wise the use of VASL resulted in a decrease in average queue length, throughput, number of stops, and an increase in travel time. Several surrogate safety measures also demonstrated the benefits of VASL in congested work zones. VASL deployments in rural work zones resulted in reductions in mean speed, speed variance, and 85th percentile speeds downstream of the VASL sign. The study makes the following recommendations based on the case studies investigated: 1. The use of VASL is recommended for uncongested work zones to achieve better speed compliance and lower speeds. Greater enforcement of regulatory speed limits could help to decrease the standard deviation in speeds; 2. The use of VASL to complement the static speed limits in rural work zones is beneficial even if the VASL is only used to display the static speed limits. It leads to safer traffic conditions by encouraging traffic to slow down gradually and by reminding traffic of the reduced speed limit. A well-designed VASL algorithm, like the P5 algorithm developed in this study, can significantly improve the mobility and safety conditions in congested work zones. The use of simulation is recommended for optimizing the VASL algorithms before field deployment.

Variable Advisory Speed Systems (VASS) provide drivers with advanced warning regarding traffic speeds downstream to help them make better decisions. Vehicle use on highways is increasing and the need to improve highways brings increased construction of highways, which increases the need for reducing the number of traffic lanes thus reducing capacity during construction. This often causes queues at the entrance to work zones. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a VASS at mitigating queues in work zone entrances.

The Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) has made improving work zone (WZ) safety a high priority. Managing vehicle speeds through work zones is perceived to be an important factor in achieving this goal. A number of speed reduction techniques are currently used by transportation agencies throughout the country to control speeds and reduce speed variation at work zones. The purpose of this project is to study these and other applicable work zone speed reduction strategies. Furthermore, this research explores transportation agencies' policies regarding managing speeds in long-term, short-term, and moving work zones. This report consists of three chapters. The first chapter, a literature review, examines the current speed reduction practices at work zones and provides a review of the relevant literature. The speed control strategies reviewed in this chapter range from posting regulatory and advisory speed limit signs to using the latest radar technologies to reduce speeds at work zones. The second chapter includes a short write-up for each identified speed control technique. The write-up includes a description, the results of any field tests, the benefits and the costs of the technology or technique. To learn more about other state policies regarding work zone speed reduction and management, the Center for Transportation Research and Education conducted a survey. The survey consists of six multipart questions. The third chapter provides summaries of the response to each question.

There has been a considerable increase in the amount of construction work on the U.S. national highways in recent years. This is a direct result of the current transportation policies emphasis on the maintenance of existing facilities rather than on building new ones. But with the increase in the amount of traffic on the interstates, the safety at the construction sites is getting worsened. Variable speed limit (VSL) systems are a kind of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technology and they try to increase safety by posting the maximum or minimum speed limits. The speeds to be posted on the VSL signs are calculated manually or with the help of algorithms. This study is an attempt to evaluate the performance of various speeds at work zones and to develop VSL control logics that would calculate suitable speeds for different traffic conditions. The research is conducted by simulating a postulated test-bed network and then validating the results by simulating a real world work zone site. The study uses a microscopic simulation model - VISSIM. The study developed a safety surrogate measure, minimum safety distance equation (MSDE), to quantify safety. Travel times have primarily been used to quantify mobility. Since most of the existing VSL control logics consider only the traffic advisory speed or average traffic speed, an attempt was made to develop a logic that would consider both safety and mobility in calculating speeds. The results of simulating the postulated network indicated that the performance of speeds varied with traffic demand volumes and compliance rate conditions. In general an increase in speed decreased safety, but improved travel time. Surprisingly at low volume and low compliance conditions an increase in speed also improved safety. In order to find the speeds that provide optimal measures of safety and mobility a normalization procedure that combines travel time and safety measures is used. The performance of the logics is mixed. In general logic 3 (that considers both safety and mobility measures to calculate VSL speed) performed better than logics 1 and 2 (that use average traffic speed). However logics 1 and 2 performed better than Logic 3 for oversaturated conditions and for low volume and low compliance conditions. Statistical analysis was performed to substantiate the results of the base cases and the logics. The performance of the VSL system was also evaluated by simulating a real world work zone site at Covington, Virginia. The results were found to be consistent with those of the postulated network.

Variable speed limit (VSL) systems have been used in a number of countries, particularly in Europe, as a method to improve flow and increase safety. VSLs use detectors to collect data on current traffic and/or weather conditions. Posted speed limits are then dynamically updated to reflect the conditions that motorists are actually experiencing. Presenting drivers with speed limits that are appropriate for current conditions may reduce speed variance, a concept sometimes called speed harmonization. If properly designed, VSL systems have been shown to reduce crash occurrence and can also reduce system travel time through increased uniformity in traffic speeds. High-volume urban work zones tend to be prone to congestion and safety problems, and VSLs may be one way to ameliorate these issues. VSLs were recently installed at a high-volume, congested urban work zone located on I-495 (the Capital Beltway, hereinafter the Beltway) between the Springfield Interchange in Springfield, Virginia, and the Virginia-Maryland state line on the Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge. VSL signs were activated in late July 2008, but initial evaluations of the system showed inconclusive effects. Changing site conditions made a direct before-and-after evaluation of the system deployed in the field problematic, and some problems with the control algorithm were also noted. Given the difficulties in evaluating the system deployed in the field, a calibrated simulation of the site was constructed to assess the effects of the VSL system on traffic operations and safety surrogate measures. The simulation platform also provided an opportunity to examine a number of system configurations to assess how changes in system design and driver behavior might affect a variety of measures. The results indicated that the VSL could create substantial improvements in traffic operations provided the demand did not exceed capacity by too large a margin. The location of the VSL signs played an important role in operational performance. The study recommends that the Virginia Department of Transportation continue to pursue this technology but carefully scrutinize algorithm design and VSL sign placement. Further, a cost/benefit analysis indicated that VSLs may be most appropriate for long-term applications.

This report summarizes and evaluates the important findings from the literature review of the studies on work zone speed control techniques. The following treatments are included in this report: 1) flagging, 2) lane width reduction, 3) law enforcement, 4) changeable message signs (CMS), 5) rumble strips, and 6) flashing beacons. The effects of the speed control treatments on speed and traffic flow are evaluated based on: A) experiences with treatment, B) effects of treatment on speed, C) effectiveness of treatment, and D) comments about treatment. A brief description of the conditions under which the treatments were applied is provided, and the speed reduction effects of each technique are discussed. A reference matrix was prepared to identify publications related to each type of speed reduction treatment used in work zones.