College students are heavy users of the Internet compared to the general population. Use of the Internet is a part of college students¿ daily routine, in part because they have grown up with computers. It is integrated into their daily communication habits and has become a technology as ordinary as the telephone or television. This report finds that: College students say the Internet has enhanced their education, and that college social life has been changed by the Internet. The report also discusses the implications of college students¿ Internet use for the future. Charts and tables.

A study of the impact of Internet use on American society, based on a series of nationally representative surveys conducted from 1995 to 2000. Drawing on nationally representative telephone surveys conducted from 1995 to 2000, James Katz and Ronald Rice offer a rich and nuanced picture of Internet use in America. Using quantitative data, as well as case studies of Web sites, they explore the impact of the Internet on society from three perspectives: access to Internet technology (the digital divide), involvement with groups and communities through the Internet (social capital), and use of the Internet for social interaction and expression (identity). To provide a more comprehensive account of Internet use, the authors draw comparisons across media and include Internet nonusers and former users in their research. The authors call their research the Syntopia Project to convey the Internet's role as one among a host of communication technologies as well as the synergy between people's online activities and their real-world lives. Their major finding is that Americans use the Internet as an extension and enhancement of their daily routines. Contrary to media sensationalism, the Internet is neither a utopia, liberating people to form a global egalitarian community, nor a dystopia-producing armies of disembodied, lonely individuals. Like any form of communication, it is as helpful or harmful as those who use it.

“Will undoubtedly be cited in the future as the major source on the history of technology and teaching in the classroom.” —History of Education Quarterly “Through Cuban’s work we can develop an understanding for how teachers define their jobs in ways that outside innovators have never appreciated. His work thus contributes a much needed vision from within.” —Educational Policy

The integration of learning, digitalization, and social sustainability has given rise to a host of challenges that demand urgent attention. Chief among these is the digital divide, a growing gap that threatens to deepen societal inequalities by restricting access to essential educational resources. Privacy concerns stemming from increased digitalization, coupled with the potential biases in algorithms form a complex set of obstacles. The transformative potential of technology in education is undeniable, yet the disparities in access and the risks associated with data privacy and algorithmic biases pose formidable hurdles to achieving a truly equitable and socially sustainable learning environment. Impact of Digitalization on Education and Social Sustainability emerges as a timely response to these challenges, offering a nuanced exploration of the intersection between learning, digitalization, and social sustainability. The book presents a comprehensive understanding of the issues at play, dissecting the challenges and opportunities. It advocates for a collaborative effort to bridge the digital divide and underscores the importance of addressing privacy concerns. By examining the potential of digital tools for personalized learning, global collaboration, and innovative teaching methods, the book charts a course toward reshaping education for a more sustainable and inclusive future.

Making a World of Difference provides a context for the whole debate about the relationship of people and computers. It looks at the role of IS/IT in a modern society and the way it impacts on people, companies, economics etc.

"This book presents advice and guidance based on previous court cases and the experience of administrators and campus hearing officers who have dealt with difficult First Ammendment issues and lived to tell about it" -- P. 2.