Chemical and Biological Defense Program annual report to Congress (2000)
Title | Chemical and Biological Defense Program annual report to Congress (2000) PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | DIANE Publishing |
Pages | 272 |
Release | 2006 |
Genre | |
ISBN | 1428980997 |
This Annual Report of the Department of Defense (DOD) Chemical and Biological Defense Program (CBDP) provides information in response to several reporting requirements. First, this report is provided in accordance with 50 U.S. Code Section 1523. (The complete reporting requirement is detailed at Annex L) This report is intended to assess: (1) the overall readiness of the Armed Forces to fight in a chemical biological (CB) warfare environment and steps taken and planned to be taken to improve such readiness; and, (2) requirements for the chemical and biological warfare defense program, including requirements for training, detection, and protective equipment, for medical prophylaxis, and for treatment of casualties resulting from use of chemical and biological weapons. The CBDP provides an integrated collection of chemical and biological defense systems to U.S. forces. The overall readiness of U.S. forces is dependent on many factors. One key factor is the availability of equipment. Chapter 2 summarizes equipment requirements and the status of research, development, test and evaluation (RDT & E) and acquisition efforts across all capability areas. Chapter 3 details the logistics status of CB defense systems. The overall logistical readiness status of the Department's CB defense equipment has improved slightly. Several factors have had an adverse effect on the overall DOD readiness and sustainment status: increased demands by the Services for some CB defense equipment; the increased overall Service requirements in order to support operations in Iraq and Afghanistan; the reorganization and the approved strength increase of the Army; and equipment modernization efforts in all of the Services. Another key factor in overall readiness is the education, training, and exercises conducted by U.S. forces to remain prepared for chemical and biological threats. Education, training, and exercises are detailed in Chapter.
Chemical and Biological Defense Program Annual Report to Congress
Title | Chemical and Biological Defense Program Annual Report to Congress PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | |
Pages | 286 |
Release | 2000 |
Genre | Biological warfare |
ISBN |
DOD Chemical and Biological Defense Program
Title | DOD Chemical and Biological Defense Program PDF eBook |
Author | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations |
Publisher | |
Pages | 70 |
Release | 2001 |
Genre | History |
ISBN |
Chemical and Biological Defense Program
Title | Chemical and Biological Defense Program PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | |
Pages | 440 |
Release | 2004 |
Genre | |
ISBN |
Chemical and Biological Defense
Title | Chemical and Biological Defense PDF eBook |
Author | United States. General Accounting Office |
Publisher | |
Pages | 32 |
Release | 2001 |
Genre | Biological warfare |
ISBN |
Department of Defense Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense Program: Annual Report to Congress 2000
Title | Department of Defense Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense Program: Annual Report to Congress 2000 PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | DIANE Publishing |
Pages | 272 |
Release | |
Genre | |
ISBN | 1428983333 |
Chemical and biological defense DOD needs to clarify expectations for medical readiness.
Title | Chemical and biological defense DOD needs to clarify expectations for medical readiness. PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | DIANE Publishing |
Pages | 57 |
Release | 2001 |
Genre | |
ISBN | 142894656X |
This testimony is based on GAO's report on DOD's preparations for medical support for chemical and biological casualties. In the report, is the response to requests that GAO determine how DOD had adapted its medical personnel to emerging chemical and biological threats. Specifically, GAO looked at how DOD and the services had addressed chemical and biological threats in the distribution of medical personnel across specialties. Also looked at was the extent of training for medical personnel in the treatment of chemical and biological casualties.