The Joint Committee on Human Rights concludes that the current statutory framework does not provide effective protection for human rights. The rights most often relevant to extradition are: prohibition of torture; fair trial; liberty and security; private and family life; and prohibition of discrimination. The Committee calls on the Government to spell out detailed safeguards in the statutory framework. Parliament should be asked to commence the "most appropriate forum" safeguard in the Police and Criminal Justice Act 2006 and that a requirement for the requesting country to show a prima facie case or similarly robust evidential threshold should be introduced in extradition cases. The most appropriate forum safeguard would require the judge to consider whether it is in the interests of justice for the individual to be tried in the requesting country - and to refuse the extradition request if it is not. The committee also calls for negotiated changes to the European Arrest Warrant, a review of the provision of legal representation. The committee also concludes that the power of the Secretary of State to refuse extradition to non-EU countries should not be extended. The powers of the judge in an extradition case should instead ensure adequate protection of rights.

On 24th December 2020, just one week before the end of the transition period, the EU and UK brokered an agreement governing extradition between the UK and the Member States. That agreement is contained in Part 3 of the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement ('the TCA'), at Title VII, and applies to those who are arrested after 2300 on 31st December 2020. The TCA substantially replicates the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, but this is not to say that extradition to EU Member States will continue almost unchanged. There are some important and potentially radical differences between the wording of the two schemes, and the potential impact of the change in legal context should not be underestimated. In 'A Practical Guide to Extradition Law Post-Brexit', the members of Temple Garden Chambers' extradition team provide a guide to the operation of Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003 ('the 2003 Act') in this new era, highlighting areas of likely continuity and change. They also introduce practitioners to cases under Part 2 of the 2003 Act, giving a clear and concise explanation of the procedural and substantive differences between the two regimes. "This book is timely, and practitioners will find it of great use ... it is well-researched, well-expressed, easy to follow and practical in its focus ... I commend it to all lawyers in the field." - from the Foreword by the Right Honourable Sir Stephen Irwin Editor Myles Grandison specialises in public law with a particular focus on extradition; representing requested persons, judicial authorities and the National Crime Agency. Myles also advises on issues such as prisoner transfer, freezing of assets across jurisdictions and mutual legal assistance. Contributors Kathryn Howarth practises in both public law and public international law. She has developed her expertise in extradition over the last decade and has been instructed in numerous leading cases. Daniel Sternberg is a specialist extradition, immigration and public law practitioner and a Deputy District Judge (Magistrates' Courts). He is ranked in Band 1 as a leading junior in the field of extradition by Chambers and Partners. Benjamin Seifert practises in extradition and public law. He appears at Westminster Magistrates' Court, the High Court and in the Supreme Court in extradition cases representing both requesting states and requested persons. His practice also includes inquests, inquiries and immigration law. Émilie Pottle is an extradition, public and international law specialist. She is recommended in the directories across multiple practice areas and has appeared before the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and Divisional Court. Saoirse Townshend has a dynamic court and advisory practice specialising in extradition and public law. Saoirse is instructed alone and is led in complex and novel points of law before the Supreme Court and the Divisional Court. Emily Wilsdon practises in public and private law. She has particular expertise in inquests and inquiries, public law (including unlawful detention claims, human rights, immigration and asylum, trafficking, and national security) and extradition. Juliet Wells qualified in October 2018 and is building a busy practice in extradition and public international law. She represents requested persons in extradition proceedings before Westminster Magistrates' Court and the High Court, both led and as sole counsel.

A novel and robust examination of all policy means and their lawfulness for recovering fugitives abroad via extradition or its alternatives.