This paper builds on global experience and Kenya's specific context to identify an effective approach to scaling up nutrition and provide an estimate of costs and benefits of key nutrition interventions. It is intended to help guide the selection of the most cost-effective interventions as well as strategies for scaling up a package of interventions tailored to Kenya's specific needs. The paper considers high-impact nutrition-specific interventions that largely rely on typical health sector delivery mechanisms. The authors estimate that the costs and benefits of implementing 11 critical nutrition-specific interventions will require a yearly public and donor investment of 76 million dollars. The expected benefits will be substantial: annually more than 455,000 disability adjusted life years (DALYs) will be averted, over 5,000 lives saved, and more than almost 700,000 cases of stunting among children under five averted. This investment will be very cost-effective with an estimated cost per DALY averted of 207 dollars cost per life saved of about 18,600 dollars and a cost per case of stunting averted of 135 dollars. Economic productivity can potentially increase by 458 million dollars over the productive lives of beneficiaries. However, the authors also calculate intermediate scale-up scenarios since it may not be feasible for the Government of Kenya or its partners to achieve full coverage in the near term. The authors compare the costs and benefits associated with three different scenarios: first, prioritizing counties, focusing the investment on counties with a high burden of stunting; second, prioritizing interventions, focusing on only a subset of the most effective interventions; and third, prioritizing both counties and interventions, delivering only the most effective subset of interventions to high-burden counties. The authors determined that the third scenario is the most cost-effective and least costly. Scaling up the most cost-effective interventions in 37 high-burden counties will avert almost 295,000 DALYs and save over 3,000 lives per year for an annual public and donor investment of 48 million dollars.

An Investment Framework for Nutrition: Reaching the Global Targets for Stunting, Anemia, Breastfeeding, and Wasting estimates the costs, impacts, and financing scenarios to achieve the World Health Assembly global nutrition targets for stunting, anemia in women, exclusive breastfeeding and the scaling up of the treatment of severe wasting among young children. To reach these four targets, the world needs US$70 billion over 10 years to invest in high-impact nutrition-specific interventions. This investment would have enormous benefits: 65 million cases of stunting and 265 million cases of anemia in women would be prevented in 2025 as compared with the 2015 baseline. In addition, at least 91 million more children would be treated for severe wasting and 105 million additional babies would be exclusively breastfed during the first six months of life over 10 years. Altogether, achieving these targets would avert at least 3.7 million child deaths. Every dollar invested in this package of interventions would yield between US$4 and US$35 in economic returns, making investing in early nutrition one of the best value-for-money development actions. Although some of the targets—especially those for reducing stunting in children and anemia in women—are ambitious and will require concerted efforts in financing, scale-up, and sustained commitment, recent experience from several countries suggests that meeting these targets is feasible. These investments in the critical 1000-day window of early childhood are inalienable and portable and will pay lifelong dividends—not only for children directly affected but also for us all in the form of more robust societies—that will drive future economies.

An Investment Framework for Nutrition: Reaching the Global Targets for Stunting, Anemia, Breastfeeding, and Wasting estimates the costs, impacts, and financing scenarios to achieve the World Health Assembly global nutrition targets for stunting, anemia in women, exclusive breastfeeding and the scaling up of the treatment of severe wasting among young children. To reach these four targets, the world needs US$70 billion over 10 years to invest in high-impact nutrition-specific interventions. This investment would have enormous benefits: 65 million cases of stunting and 265 million cases of anemia in women would be prevented in 2025 as compared with the 2015 baseline. In addition, at least 91 million more children would be treated for severe wasting and 105 million additional babies would be exclusively breastfed during the first six months of life over 10 years. Altogether, achieving these targets would avert at least 3.7 million child deaths. Every dollar invested in this package of interventions would yield between US$4 and US$35 in economic returns, making investing in early nutrition one of the best value-for-money development actions. Although some of the targets--especially those for reducing stunting in children and anemia in women--are ambitious and will require concerted efforts in financing, scale-up, and sustained commitment, recent experience from several countries suggests that meeting these targets is feasible. These investments in the critical 1000-day window of early childhood are inalienable and portable and will pay lifelong dividends--not only for children directly affected but also for us all in the form of more robust societies--that will drive future economies.

This paper builds on global experience and Zambia's specific context to identify aneffective nutrition approach along with costs and benefits of key nutrition interventions. It isintended to help guide the selection of the most cost-effective interventions as well as strategiesfor scaling these up. The paper considers both relevant "nutrition-specific" interventions, largelydelivered through the health sector, and multisectoral "nutrition-sensitive" interventions, delivered through other sectors such as agriculture, education, and water and sanitation. We estimate that the costs and benefits of implementing 10 nutrition-specific interventions would require an annual public investment of USD 40.5 million and would avert over 112,000 DALYs, save over 2,800 lives, and prevent 62,000 cases of stunting. Economic productivity could potentially increase by USD 915 million annually over the productive lives of the beneficiaries, with an impressive internal rate of return of 32 percent. However, because it is unlikely that the Government of the Zambia or its partners will find the USD 40.5 million necessary each year to reach full coverage, we also consider scale-up scenarios based on considerations of their potential for impact, burden of stunting, resource requirements, and implementation capacity. The two scenarios that scale up the nine most cost-effective nutrition-specific interventions (excluding the public provision of complementary foods) are the most advantageous in terms of cost-effectiveness and resource requirements and would require USD 11 million to scale up to partial levels and USD 23 to scale up to full coverage levels. Among the 8 nutrition-specific interventions we consider, school-baseddeworming is low cost and effective. The interventions we reviewed in the agriculture sector areexpensive when compared to nutrition-specific interventions, although very little cost effectiveness data are available for the nutrition-sensitive interventions to make carefulcomparisons. These findings point to a powerful set of nutrition-specific interventions and acandidate list of nutrition-sensitive approaches that represent a highly cost-effective approach toreducing child malnutrition in Zambia.

This edited volume “Food Security in Africa” is a collection of reviewed and relevant research chapters offering a comprehensive overview of recent developments in the field of food safety and availability, water issues, farming and nutrition. The book comprises single chapters authored by various researchers and edited by an expert active in the public health and food security research area. All chapters are complete in itself but united under a common research study topic. This publication aims at providing a thorough overview of the latest research efforts by international authors on Africa’s food security challenges, quality of water, small-scale farming as well as economic and social challenges that this continent is facing. Hopefully, this volume will open new possible research paths for further novel developments.

This brief examines estimates produced by several recent model simulations and frameworks that focus on the cost of ending hunger as well as progress toward other development goals—estimates that range from US$7 billion to US$265 billion per year. The differences among these estimates are largely attributable to the different targeted objectives and policy questions of each modeling exercise, different investment strategies considered, and varying assumptions about the role of different sectors in reducing hunger.

Sustainable Public Food Procurement (PFP) represents a key game changer for food systems transformation. It can influence both food consumption and food production patterns. It can deliver multiple social, economic and environmental benefits towards sustainable food systems for healthy diets. This publication aims to contribute to the improved understanding, dissemination and use of PFP as a development tool in particular in the case of school meals programmes. In this Volume 2, researchers, policymakers and development partners can find extensive evidence of the instruments, enablers and barriers for PFP implementation. It also provides case studies with local, regional and national experiences from Africa, Asia, Europe and North and South America. Volume 1 of this publication, available at https://doi.org/10.4060/cb7960en, presents further analysis on how PFP can be used as a development tool and deliver multiple benefits for multiple beneficiaries. It argues that PFP can provide a market for local and smallholder farmers, promote the conservation and sustainable use of agrobiodiversity, and improve the nutrition and health of children and communities.