CIRCUMCISION: THE HIDDEN TRAUMA is the first intensive exploration of the unrecognized psychological and social aspects of this increasingly controversial American cultural practice. The book has been endorsed by dozens of professionals in psychology, psychiatry, child development, pediatrics, obstetrics, childbirth education, sociology, and anthropology, including Ashley Montagu, Christiane Northrup, Warren Farrell, Sheila Kitzinger, Sam Keen, and Penelope Leach. Without much knowledge, the American public generally assumes that our cultural practice of circumcision is a trivial and benign procedure. Plain facts and research results conflict with these beliefs and raise serious questions. Dr. Goldman's application of psychological and social research coherently explains both the tenacity of the practice and the contradictory information and beliefs about it. After a review of the surprising abilities of infants and their responses to circumcision pain, the long-term psychological effects of circumcision are examined from the perspectives of both traditional and innovative psychological theories. We learn that circumcision has potential effects not only on men and sexuality, but also on mother-child relationships, male-female relationships, and societal traits and problems. The text is supported with clinical reports, interviews, surveys, and thorough documentation. CIRCUMCISION: THE HIDDEN TRAUMA identifies an overlooked source of early pain and points us in the direction of both healing and preventing this pain. It is of particular interest to men who seek to explore their sexuality and deepen self-awareness; women who want to understand men better; parents and children's advocates; childbirth educators and allied workers; and mental health, medical, and academic professionals. The book has wide appeal because, more generally, it is about trusting our instincts, questioning some of our cultural values and assumptions, and reflecting on who we are and who we can be as individuals and as a society. Ronald Goldman, Ph.D., is a psychologist, educator, and executive director of the Circumcision Resource Center in Boston (www.circumcision.org), a nonprofit educational organization. He gives lectures and seminars on the psychological and social aspects of circumcision and provides consultation to expectant parents and circumcised men. Dr. Goldman has been a featured guest on local and national radio and television shows and has been cited in numerous newspapers and periodicals.

An unbiased and thoughtful exploration of newborn elective circumcision. Guides parents through full range of issues, including medical, cultural, religious, personal, sexual, and ethical and helps them reach a decision that is right for their newborn son and themselves.

Design. Mail survey.

ABSTRACT: A review of literature from the fields of nursing, medicine, sociology, law and psychology from the late 1980's to the present reveals extensive discussion and debate of male circumcision. This investigation was an attempt to determine factors which may influence parental decision making regarding routine newborn circumcision and to determine parental attitudes toward circumcision. The issue has been debated for decades; with proponents and opponents alike arguing their position with passion. In 1999 the American Academy of Pediatrics (APA) updated their current policy on routine newborn circumcision. The APA does not recommend routine newborn circumcision, instead declares circumcision to be a decision best left to parents. The policy further states the decision regarding circumcision should be made after parents receive accurate and impartial information from their healthcare provider. Using a questionnaire asking both demographic and nondemographic questions a sample of parents of male children aged birth to thirty-six months were invited to participate in the research. One hundred-one participants returned the completed questionnaire. Data collected shows that although not statistically significant, there does seem to be a trend between decision making regarding circumcision and advice from healthcare providers. This is reflected by the fact that of the participants who had their son circumcised 58% did so without advice from any healthcare provider with an increase to nearly 80% after discussion with a healthcare provider. Data was unable to show any significant effect by demographic variables on parental decision making regarding circumcision.