Above all, Alien Reasoning is an entertaining story about an Alien invasion of Earth, or is it simply an Alien Visit that will benefit humankind. Only time will tell. At face value, it is a story about Aliens, who are intellectually superior to humans, coming to earth. Their stated aim, to share knowledge. At a deeper level, it is a commentary on our systems of commerce, an exploration of the human psyche and a story that challenges our interpretations of the laws of physics, and suggests other possibilities for the reader to ponder. It is also a travel guide of sorts, as it expounds on the interesting tourist attractions in the general area of each of the places visited throughout the book. There are two main human characters in the story. The first is Bart, a wide-eyed physics enthusiast, who is totally enchanted by the newcomers and who has many meaningful discussions with them. The second is Augur, an intrepid news reporter, who questions everything. He is determined to understand the Aliens’ true agenda, and to get to the bottom of their real reason for coming to Earth. Each character in the book and some fictitious place names, have been given a name, which is an English word that is not used in common speech. An included Glossary of Terms, at the very back of this book, in Appendix 4, provides the dictionary definition for each name; which is in each case indicative of the character of that person or place. For example, Australia’s Prime Minister, those gender is never identified throughout the story, is named: Aegis, which means: Protector; Shield of Zeus.

“A remarkable book capable of reshaping what one takes philosophy to be.” —Cora Diamond, Kenan Professor of Philosophy Emerita, University of Virginia Could there be a logical alien—a being whose ways of talking, inferring, and contradicting exhibit an entirely different logical shape than ours, yet who nonetheless is thinking? Could someone, contrary to the most basic rules of logic, think that two contradictory statements are both true at the same time? Such questions may seem outlandish, but they serve to highlight a fundamental philosophical question: is our logical form of thought merely one among many, or must it be the form of thought as such? From Descartes and Kant to Frege and Wittgenstein, philosophers have wrestled with variants of this question, and with a range of competing answers. A seminal 1991 paper, James Conant’s “The Search for Logically Alien Thought,” placed that question at the forefront of contemporary philosophical inquiry. The Logical Alien, edited by Sofia Miguens, gathers Conant’s original article with reflections on it by eight distinguished philosophers—Jocelyn Benoist, Matthew Boyle, Martin Gustafsson, Arata Hamawaki, Adrian Moore, Barry Stroud, Peter Sullivan, and Charles Travis. Conant follows with a wide-ranging response that places the philosophical discussion in historical context, critiques his original paper, addresses the exegetical and systematic issues raised by others, and presents an alternative account. The Logical Alien challenges contemporary conceptions of how logical and philosophical form must each relate to their content. This monumental volume offers the possibility of a new direction in philosophy.

Is logic a good tool for making decisions? Can it make us better listeners and help us find coherence in views that we disagree with? Is Sherlock Holmes actually good at logic? Patrick Girard addresses these and other questions by presenting logic as the guardian of coherence. Logic, Girard argues, finds coherence in the patterns of reasoning across science, religion, and everyday decision making. It helps communities engage safely by replacing contentious debates with shared, constructive reasoning – logic provides neutral ground for the healthy pursuit of common goals and interests. Logic in the Wild employs common sense language, eschewing technical jargon, symbols, and equations. Girard’s attention focuses on logic’s power to find what unites the complex and the simple, the abstract and the concrete, the theoretical and the practical. In treating logic not as a passive subject to learn but as an active discipline to engage with, Logic in the Wild teaches us to identify patterns in our own reasoning, which inevitably helps us better confront questions central to everyday life.

The workbook introduces the reader to more than 100 patterns of reasoning, some valid, some not. Through patient reading and by completing the exercises, the reader will attain a mastery of these concepts.

Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment offers authoritative, jargon-free essays and critical commentaries on accelerating technological progress and the notion of technological singularity. It focuses on conjectures about the intelligence explosion, transhumanism, and whole brain emulation. Recent years have seen a plethora of forecasts about the profound, disruptive impact that is likely to result from further progress in these areas. Many commentators however doubt the scientific rigor of these forecasts, rejecting them as speculative and unfounded. We therefore invited prominent computer scientists, physicists, philosophers, biologists, economists and other thinkers to assess the singularity hypotheses. Their contributions go beyond speculation, providing deep insights into the main issues and a balanced picture of the debate.