En este documento se retoma, tras los referendos danes y frances y la crisis de los mercados de cambios de septiembre de 1992, el debate sobre la union monetaria y el tratado de Maastricht. Analiza los beneficios de la union monetaria y la posibilidad de conseguirlos con medios menos radicales, como el mantenimiento firme de tipos de cambio fijos; los costes, mediante el examen de los mecanismos de ajuste alternativos al tipo de cambio (precios y salarios, migraciones, flujos de capital y transferencias fiscales interregionales); el papel del federalismo fiscal frente a las restricciones propuestas en Maastricht; el diseño del Banco Central Europeo (BCE), su independencia de las presiones politicas y responsabilidad en la supervision prudencial; la transicion a la moneda unica y al BCE, y la conveniencia de los criterios de convergencia adoptados. Finaliza con el estudio de las implicaciones de la UEM en el resto del mundo: demanda de dinero y coordinacion de la politica internacional. Contiene bibliografia. (pgp).

This insider's guide to a topical issue is designed to be of use to students, academics, policymakers and commentators alike. It contains extracts from documents and a chronology.

This book provides the first in-depth account of how European Union opt-outs and differentiated integration work in practice.

Three nations in similar economic situations since the 1970s have pursued different monetary strategies. Walsh argues that monetary policies produce predictable winners and losers, and that policy choice is a function of how industrial firms, banks and unions use their political resources.

A comprehensive, concise--and unique--examination of the history of European monetary integration since the end of World War II, and how this fits into the anticipated economic and monetary union and closer political cooperation of European countries.

This Open Access book offers a novel view on the benefits of a lasting variation between the member states in the EU. In order to bring together thirty very different European states and their citizens, the EU will have to offer more scope for variation. Unlike the existing differentiation by means of opt-outs and deviations, variation is not a concession intended to resolve impasses in negotiations; it is, rather, a different structuring principle. It takes differences in needs and in democratically supported convictions seriously. A common core remains necessary, specifically concerning the basic principles of democracy, rule of law, fundamental rights and freedoms, and the common market. By taking this approach, the authors remove the pressure to embrace uniformity from the debate about the EU’s future. The book discusses forms of variation that fall both within and outside the current framework of European Union Treaties. The scope for these variations is mapped out in three domains: the internal market; the euro; and asylum, migration and border control.