Originally created for personal injury law firm clients, this Personal Injury Journal was designed by Jamie Davis Whitmer (a litigation paralegal) as a tool to potentially increase the value of Plaintiffs' pain and suffering damages by logging and utilizing the power of specifics to help better portray the injured client as an individual instead of another set of medical records to feed into Colossus. The injured person should mark their pain on the pain diagrams on the left side of the book and then complete the prompts on the right side of the page that include the following topics: Doctor/Facility visited today; Treatments given / tests or future treatments ordered; How are you feeling today? How did your injuries affect your job today? Did your injuries affect your household duties or family life today? Did you miss any events/social activities today because of your injuries? Did you incur any costs today that were accident related? Other notes/things to do related to the accident. Besides the pain and suffering aspect, the journals also give the injured person a tool to keep track of all their doctors and note when they finish treatment.

The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.

Lanier's Texas Personal Injury Forms book, written by renowned personal injury attorney Mark Lanier of the Lanier Law Firm, will guide you through your entire PI case, soup to nuts. The chapters include: New Client/Initial Intake Pre-Litigation Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Benefits and Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Petitions Pending Litigation Discovery Motions Arbitration and Mediation Trial Settlement and Post-trial

The study of the law of tort is generally preoccupied by case law, while the fundamental impact of legislation is often overlooked. At a jurisprudential level there is an unspoken view that legislation is generally piecemeal and at best self-contained and specific; at worst dependent on the whim of political views at a particular time. With a different starting point, this volume seeks to test such notions, illustrating, among other things, the widespread and lasting influence of legislation on the shape and principles of the law of tort; the variety of forms of legislation and the complex nature of political and policy concerns that may lie behind their enactment; the sometimes unexpected consequences of statutory reform; and the integration not only of statutory rules but also of legislative policy into the operation of tort law today. The apparently sharp distinction between judicially created private law principles, and democratically enacted legislative rules and policies, is therefore questioned, and it is argued that to describe the principles of the law of tort without referring to statute is potentially highly misleading. This book shows that legislation is important not only because of the way it varies or replaces case law, but because it also deeply influences the intrinsic character of that law, providing some of its most familiar characteristics. The book provides the first extended interpretation of legislative intervention in the law of tort. Each of the chapters, by leading tort scholars, deals with an aspect of the influence of legislation on the law of tort. While the nature, sources and extent of legislative influence in personal injury law is an essential feature of the collection, other significant areas of tort law are explored, including tort in the context of commercial law, labour law, regulation and the welfare state. Essays on the Compensation Act 2006 and Human Rights Act 1998 bring the current state of the interplay between tort, politics and legislation to the forefront. In all of these contexts, contributors explore the deeper lessons that can be learned about the nature of the law of tort and its changing role and functions over time. Cited with approval in the Singapore Court of Appeal by VK Rajah JA in See Toh Siew Kee vs Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) Ltd and others, [2013] SGCA 29