Excerpt from The Criminal Responsibility of Lunatics: A Study in Comparative Law, Thesis Approved for the Degree of Doctor of Laws in the University of London The feud between medical men and lawyers in all questions concerning the criminal liability of lunatics is of old standing. More than one authority on either side has tried to bring about a reconciliation between the contending parties. But their endeavours have been crowned with very little success. For though it cannot be denied that the strife and warfare has of late lost much of its former bitterness, a modus vivendi satisfactory to both parties has not been found. Discouraged by such experiences, others have thought it well-nigh impossible to bridge over the gulf which in their opinion must ever separate the two hostile camps; they think that the visual angle from which the two professions look at the problem is too different to allow of a solution acceptable to both. I do not share this pessimistic view, nor the policy of the laisser faire which is its logical outcome. If all attempts hitherto made to bring the dispute to a peaceful ending have failed, and were doomed to failure from the very outset, the reason is not far to seek. Almost all the writers who have approached the investigation in a conciliatory spirit, have sought success by forsaking the claims of their own professional brethren and blindly recognising the opponents' claims; and surely deserters do not make good peace-makers. Yet in no other way could those writers hope to reach their goal. For how is the lawyer to distinguish between fact and hypothesis in the literature of psychological medicine? About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Unlike some other reproductions of classic texts (1) We have not used OCR(Optical Character Recognition), as this leads to bad quality books with introduced typos. (2) In books where there are images such as portraits, maps, sketches etc We have endeavoured to keep the quality of these images, so they represent accurately the original artefact. Although occasionally there may be certain imperfections with these old texts, we feel they deserve to be made available for future generations to enjoy.