The DoD has a well-established program for technical/functional development that features uniform standards across all components. Components are pursuing managerial/leadership development along divergent paths that reflect their unique needs. We have developed an outline to integrate managerial/leadership education and training with the existing technical/functional system. The outline calls for DoD to incorporate the latest advantages in technology to take advantage of the best development practices used by other federal agencies and the private sector. The approach requires no changes in statutes and only minimal modification of existing policy. To implement the ideas presented in the outline, we recommend the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) establish managerial/leadership competencies to supplement the existing technical/functional standards, establish continuous learning requirements, and work with the components on a number of programming issues.

The DoD has a well-established program for technical/functional development that features uniform standards across all components. Components are pursuing managerial/leadership development along divergent paths that reflect their unique needs. We have developed an outline to integrate managerial/leadership education and training with the existing technical/functional system. The outline calls for DoD to incorporate the latest advantages in technology to take advantage of the best development practices used by other federal agencies and the private sector. The approach requires no changes in statutes and only minimal modification of existing policy. To implement the ideas presented in the outline, we recommend the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) establish managerial/leadership competencies to supplement the existing technical/functional standards, establish continuous learning requirements, and work with the components on a number of programming issues.

The Pres. has announced his intention to improve the acquisition process, particularly given the half a trillion dollars the fed. gov¿t. spent in FY 2009 on acquiring goods and services. The DoD spent $384 billion in FY 2009 on goods and services -- double what it spent in 2001. A high-quality workforce with the right competencies and skill sets will be critical to improving DoD acquisitions. This report determined the efficacy of DoD¿s certification training for its acquisition workforce. It assessed: (1) DoD¿s capability to provide certification training; (2) the extent that such training reaches members of the workforce; and (3) the extent that previous training recommendations have been implemented. Charts and tables. A print on demand publication.

GAO's continuing reviews of the acquisition workforce, focusing on the Department of Defense (DOD); the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force; the Departments of Veterans Affairs, Energy, and Health and Human Services; the General Services Administration; and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, indicate that some of the government's largest procurement operations are not run efficiently. GAO found that requirements are not clearly defined, prices and alternatives are not fully considered, or contracts are not adequately overseen. The ongoing technological revolution requires a workforce with new knowledge, skills, and abilities, and the nature of acquisition is changing from routine simple buys toward more complex acquisitions and new business practices. DOD has adopted multidisciplinary and multifunctional definitions of their acquisition workforce, but the civilian agencies have not. DOD and the civilian agencies reviewed have developed specific training requirements for their acquisition workforce and mechanisms to track the training of acquisition personnel. All of the agencies reviewed said they had sufficient funding to provide current required core training for their acquisition workforce, but some expressed concerns about funding training for future requirements and career development, particularly because of budget cuts made recently at the Defense Acquisition University.