A low-cost wearable Commercial-off-The-Shelf (COTS) Augmented Reality (AR) Head-Up Display (HUD) system is designed, successfully reduced to practice, and flight tested. The system is developed based on the need for a technology that improves loss-of-control (LOC) safety in the General Aviation (GA) sector. The accuracy of the flight-path based system is determined to be within a degree of the truth source. The repeatability of the data from the COTS system is excellent. A complementary filter is proposed for air data flow angles and successfully flight tested for straight and level flight, dynamic maneuvering, and atmospheric turbulence, provided that a reasonably accurate lift curve is determined. A novel accelerometer method is proposed for estimating the relative pitch attitude estimation of the pilot's head. The method is evaluated on the ground and in flight, and is shown to be superior to other commercially available solutions. The HUD system is shown, through various test points, to make flying more intuitive and efficient, thereby affecting the GA LOC. In all performed tasks, experienced and inexperienced pilots are used to fly the aircraft and evaluate the technology.

The material provided in this document consists of recommendations related to the design, analysis, testing, and intended functions of head up displays (HUDs) for transport category airplanes. The content of the document is limited to statements of general design and installation considerations, including display function criticality and compliance considerations; symbology, coding, clutter, dimensionality, and attention getting requirements; equipment installation; display visual characteristics; failure modes; information display and formatting; specific integrated display and mode; and system verification.

Two experiments examined the effects of display location (head up vs. head down) and image intensity/clutter on flight path performance and mid-air target detection in a general aviation cruise flight environment. In Experiment 1, a low-fidelity simulation, both near-domain and far-domain Instrumentation were presented at the same optical distance. Detection of commanded flight changes and maintenance of desired flight path flight were generally better in the head-down condition, an advantage attributed to the superior image contrast ratios in that condition. In contrast, target detection was superior with the head-up display, reflecting an attentional tradeoff Experiment 2 was performed with pilots viewing far-domain imagery (and airborne targets) on an Evans and Sutherland display positioned near optical infinity, head-up display (HUD) imagery at the same optical distance, and head-down imagery at a near distance typical of the instrument panel. The degree of clutter was also varied and image contrast ratios were equated between head-up and head-down viewing conditions. Flight performance was equivalent between the HUD and head-down locations. However, detection of both near-domain events (commanded changes) and far-domain targets was better in the HUD condition, revealing the HUD benefit of reduced scanning. Adding extra information (clutter) to the HUD inhibited detection of both events in both head-up and head-down locations. However, this clutter cost was diminished for far-domain target detection if the added information was "low-lighted." Flight performance was superior in clear weather, when the true horizon was available for viewing. The data provided little evidence that attention was modulated in depth (near vs. far domains), but rather suggested that attention was modulated between tasks (flight control and detection).

A head-up display either Heads-Up display-also familiar like a HUD-is whatever see-through display that gives information short of needing consumers to look off as of their conventional viewpoints. The cradle of the designation branches as of a pilot being capable to view data with the lead located 'up' and sensing ahead, in lieu of angled down sensing at lesser tools. There has never been a Head-up display Guide like this. It contains 48 answers, much more than you can imagine; comprehensive answers and extensive details and references, with insights that have never before been offered in print. Get the information you need--fast! This all-embracing guide offers a thorough view of key knowledge and detailed insight. This Guide introduces what you want to know about Head-up display. A quick look inside of some of the subjects covered: Head-up display - History, Instrument Landing System - Special CAT II and CAT III operations, Contact lens - Current research, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim - Gameplay, Wearable computers - 1989-1999, Wearable Computer - 1990s, Avionics Electro-Optics, Toyota FCHV-adv - Motor Triathlon Race Car, Airbus A320 family - Flight deck and avionics, Optical head-mounted display - Lumus, Fighter aircraft - Fourth generation jet fighters (circa 1970 to mid-1990s), Google Glass - Development, BMW E60 - Equipment, Optical head-mounted display - Optinvent, Organic light-emitting diode - Structure, Unity (user interface) - User interface, Acronyms and abbreviations in avionics - H, Disclosure (novel) - Underlying themes, Head-up display - Developmental / experimental uses, Heads-Up Display - Civil aircraft specific applications, OLED - Structure, Halo 4 - Gameplay, Dashboard - Fashion in instrumentation, HUD (video gaming), Automotive night vision - Honda, Machinima - Limitations and solutions, Heads-Up Display - Automobiles, Prius - 2011 facelift, Instrumentation - Aircraft, Head-up display - Automobiles, and much more...