Adolescence is a distinct, yet transient, period of development between childhood and adulthood characterized by increased experimentation and risk-taking, a tendency to discount long-term consequences, and heightened sensitivity to peers and other social influences. A key function of adolescence is developing an integrated sense of self, including individualization, separation from parents, and personal identity. Experimentation and novelty-seeking behavior, such as alcohol and drug use, unsafe sex, and reckless driving, are thought to serve a number of adaptive functions despite their risks. Research indicates that for most youth, the period of risky experimentation does not extend beyond adolescence, ceasing as identity becomes settled with maturity. Much adolescent involvement in criminal activity is part of the normal developmental process of identity formation and most adolescents will mature out of these tendencies. Evidence of significant changes in brain structure and function during adolescence strongly suggests that these cognitive tendencies characteristic of adolescents are associated with biological immaturity of the brain and with an imbalance among developing brain systems. This imbalance model implies dual systems: one involved in cognitive and behavioral control and one involved in socio-emotional processes. Accordingly adolescents lack mature capacity for self-regulations because the brain system that influences pleasure-seeking and emotional reactivity develops more rapidly than the brain system that supports self-control. This knowledge of adolescent development has underscored important differences between adults and adolescents with direct bearing on the design and operation of the justice system, raising doubts about the core assumptions driving the criminalization of juvenile justice policy in the late decades of the 20th century. It was in this context that the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) asked the National Research Council to convene a committee to conduct a study of juvenile justice reform. The goal of Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach was to review recent advances in behavioral and neuroscience research and draw out the implications of this knowledge for juvenile justice reform, to assess the new generation of reform activities occurring in the United States, and to assess the performance of OJJDP in carrying out its statutory mission as well as its potential role in supporting scientifically based reform efforts.

Testimony given at a hearing on the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act which is scheduled to expire in September 1992 is presented in this document. An opening statement by Representative Matthew G. Martinez, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Education and Labor, discusses the vulnerability of youth. Testimony and prepared statements or materials from these individuals are included: (1) Chris Baca, Youth Development, Inc., Albuquerque, New Mexico; (2) Jim Brown, Community Research Associates, Champaign, Illinois; (3) Betty A. Downes, Chair, New Mexico Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee, Santa Fe, New Mexico; (4) Alice King, Former Chair, New Mexico Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee, Santa Fe, New Mexico; (5) Orlando Martinez, Associate Director, Family and Children Services, Department of Institutions, Denver, Colorado; (6) Vicki Neiberg, National Coalition of State Juvenile Justice Advisory Groups, Lansing, Michigan; (7) Dennis Noonan, Our Town, Tucson, Arizona; (8) Dan Prince, Chief of Planning, Division of Children and Families, Department of Human Resources, State of Nevada, Carson City, Nevada; and (9) Robert E. Shepherd, Jr., Chair, Reauthorization Committee, National Coalition of State Juvenile Justice Advisory Groups, Richmond, Virginia. (ABL)

Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche.