Research has shown that various leadership styles have different impacts on leader outcomes such as satisfaction, extra effort, and effectiveness. Specifically, researchers have found that transformational leadership positively impacts follower perceptions of satisfaction, extra effort, and leader effectiveness (Avolio, Bass, & lung, 1995; Philbin, 1997; Yammarino, Spangler, & Bass, 1993). However, research has shown that not all leaders display transformational leadership. In fact, Eagly, Karau, & lohnson (1992) and their colleagues have shown transformational leadership in education to be linked to the extent to which male and female principals carry out their gender roles - referring to role congruity. Currently, not much is known empirically about the relationship between the role of the elementary school principal leadership and gender roles and its combined effects on teachers' perceived satisfaction, perceived effectiveness of their principals, and their assessment of extra effort put forth towards their job. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between leadership style (transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire) and psychological gender role group (masculine, feminine, undifferentiated, androgynous) of elementary school principals. Exploration of this topic filled a void in empirical investigations of the psychological gender perspective of school leadership. Multivariate Analysis of Variance techniques were used to examine the relationships between and among principal psychological gender role, biological gender, principal effectiveness, teacher satisfaction, and teacher extra effort. Additionally, canonical correlation was used to examine the relationship between leadership factor variable set and psychological gender role variable set. Results detected one relationship exists between psychological gender role and leadership behavior variable sets. Specifically, findings suggest femininity, masculinity, idealized influence attribute, idealized influence behavior, inspiration-motivation, intellection stimulation, individual consideration, contingent reward, and laissez-faire provide the best linear combinations of Pearson correlations between the leadership behavior and psychological gender role variable sets. In addition, results indicated statistically significant differences in perceived principal effectiveness, teacher perceived satisfaction, and teacher extra effort based on teacher perceived level of principal psychological gender. Teachers who perceived their principals as androgynous and feminine reported higher levels of extra effort, satisfaction, and principal effectiveness. Leadership behavior did not appear to have a significant influence on extra effort, satisfaction, and principal effectiveness. Additionally, the interaction effect between perceived principal psychological gender role group and principal biological gender was not statistically significant.

The principal’s focus was on defining the school’s mission, managing theinstructional program, and promoting a positive school climate; however, itremained unclear how teachers' perceptions affect instructional leadershipfunctions, or perceived behaviors, through the lens of gender (Eagly et al., 1992;Gallon, 1998; Hallinger, 2011; Hallinger & Murphy, 1985; Hallinger et al., 2013;Hallinger et al., 2016; Krüger, 2008; Terry, 1996). Questions remain aboutteachers' perceptions of male and female principals' instructional leadershipfunctions, or perceived behaviors. In this ex–post facto quantitative study, Iexamined the teacher–perceived instructional leadership functions, or perceivedbehaviors, of male and female principals in ten elementary schools in a district inTennessee during the 2021–2022 school year. Data were collected using thePrincipal Instructional Management Rating Scale from 146 classroom teachers.Multivariate analysis of covariance results revealed no significant differencesamong the principals’ gender on the combined dependent variable of the teninstructional leadership functions, or perceived behaviors. Multivariate analysis ofcovariance results revealed no significant differences among the teachers’ genderon the ten instructional leadership functions, or perceived behaviors, as thedependent variable. Individual linear regressions revealed the gender of theprincipal did not significantly predict any of the ten instructional leadershipfunctions, but the gender of the teacher did significantly predict four of the teninstructional leadership functions, or perceived behaviors.

Examines principals' and teachers' perceptions of principals' leadership behaviors and whether leadership behaviors impact student learning viewed through the lens of transformational leadership. Analyzes using mixed methods seven elementary schools in a medium size district in the central region of North Carolina. Addresses the factors that challenge principals as they provide leadership in their schools. Includes principal interviews and focus groups as qualitative data.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the perceived leadership style of the principal and late career teacher job satisfaction. In addition, the impact of demographic variables including age, race, and gender were explored. The participants consisted of 70 late career K-6 teachers in 17 elementary schools across three school districts in Southern Arizona. The participants completed two survey instruments. Interview data was also collected. Pearson product-moment correlation tests were used to analyze the relationship between nine leadership variables describing transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership, and intrinsic and extrinsic satisfaction variables. Correlation tests were also used to examine the relationship between leadership variables and demographic variables. Multiple regression analyses were used to analyze the intercorrelations between leadership and demographic variables and extrinsic and intrinsic satisfaction. The examination of the relationship between leadership variables and intrinsic and extrinsic variables produced several significant findings. The relationship between leadership variables and demographic variables also produced several significant findings. The multiple regression analyses identified a significant relationship between the perception of Idealized Influence and extrinsic satisfaction. A significant relationship was also found between Contingent Reward and intrinsic satisfaction. Qualitative data from individual teacher interviews supported these findings. The overall findings from this study suggest that late career teachers' perceptions of their principals' leadership styles impact intrinsic and extrinsic satisfaction. More specifically, some transformational and transactional variables had a positive impact on job satisfaction. These findings suggest that a balance of transactional and transformational leadership styles may be most effective for school leaders wishing to improve the satisfaction of late career teachers. A model was developed to describe the findings of the study. The Leadership-Satisfaction model provides an additional perspective on the relationship between perceived leadership and satisfaction by illustrating that perceived leadership impacts extrinsic and intrinsic factors which affect the overall picture of satisfaction.