Excerpt from Cases Relating to Railways and Canals Argued and Adjudged in the Courts of Law and Equity, 1849 to 1852, Vol. 6 Page 618, in name of can, for The London 8: North Western Railway Company v. M'michael read The N orth Western Railway Company v. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1850 edition. Excerpt: ...AND ThE LORD CHANCELLOR. $ 18th. 1848. Barker V. The North Staffordshire Kailway?', Apnl I5a, Company. June 8th, T24th, Sf 28th. HE plaintiffs in this case were the executors of G. Bar-A Railway ker, who died possessed of a lease for a term of years, which notice&afthey required ten parcels of land, on one of which was a brine-pit and steam-engine connected with certain saltworks. The parties could not agree upon the price. The Company then caused a valuation to be made of eight out of the ten parcels; they deposited the determined snm, and gave a bond under their corporate seal, but without sureties, and entered upon the eight parcels, under the 85th section of the Lands Clauses Act. The plaintiffs then filed their bill stating these facts, and praying an injunction to restrain the Company from entering on the two pieces of land not included in the valuation, and also from entering upon or continuing in possession of the other eight pieces until they had paid the purchase-money and compensation for their interest in all the lands comprised in the notice. Vice. Chancellor Knight Bruce granted the injunction as prayed. The Company then made a further valuation of the two pieces of land omitted in the former valuation, deposited the determined sum in addition to the former amount, and delivered a new bond with sureties. They then moved before the Lord Chancellor to discharge the order for the injunction: --Held, affirming the decision of Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce, that the injunction had been rightly granted; that the appeal motion could not be sustained oy the subsequent proceedings of the Company; and it was dismissed with costs. The Company moved, before Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce, to dissolve the injunction, when the...

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.