Written in an accessible and personal style, this innovative study of authority in education examines scenarios of authority in ways that problematize, augment, and redefine prevalent ideas of how it works. Usually seen as a thing that people have, the author suggests that authority should be understood instead as a relation that happens between people, which gets enacted in circuits where each participant has a role to play; those circuits can include teachers, students, the books they read, as well as former teachers and former students. Drawing on ideas from psychoanalysis, hermeneutics, philosophy of language, and the work of Jacques Derrida and Paulo Freire, the book offers a useful new understanding of authority in education.

Authority based on relationship--especially in church government.

Over the course of the past century and a half, many different philosophical schools of thought have offered perspectives on educational authority. Traditionalists have argued that, as the expert, the teacher should maintain all authority in the room. Progressivists wished that students would be given authority, so that their own interests and motivations might take them forward in education. Many of those educating for social justice believe that authority should belong to students, unless an opportunity to educate for social justice arises. Each of these schools views authority as a thing that may be given or taken. If authority is seen differently, as the product of a relation between people, there is much more room for the empowerment of both teacher and student, and to challenge the educational system. This thesis is an exploration of the implications of relational authority, as it exists in public education.

The inner and outer lives of Gen Z are complex. The world today is complicated. The way young people form bonds and make meaning is changing. Our data show that checking "affiliated" or "unaffiliated" on a survey doesn't tell the whole story on young peoples' religious identities. It doesn't tell us all we need to know about the things young people long for and belong to. Behaviors tell us more than checked boxes. Relationships reveal more than affiliations. And the most effective relationships practice Relational Authority, a framework that responds to these complexities, that is rooted in five practices: listening, transparency, integrity, care, and expertise. The largest data set of its kind, The State of Religion & Young People 2020: Relational Authority collects data from over 10,000 surveys and over 150 interviews with young people ages 13-25. With special features on politics, careers, and virtual environments--as well as a comprehensive look at the changing social, religious, and cultural landscape--it not only provides data, but actionable insights and fresh frameworks to help you act on these findings.

A reinterpretation of world politics drawing on Chinese cultural and philosophical traditions to argue for a focus on relations amongst actors, rather than on the actors individually.

Walter C. Wright develops a biblical management model that fosters an environment of active participation in an organization's mission. Foreword by Richard J. Mouw and Eugene H. Peterson.

When we encounter a news story, why do we accept its version of events? Why do we even recognize it as news? A complicated set of cultural, structural, and technological relationships inform this interaction, and Journalistic Authority provides a relational theory for explaining how journalists attain authority. The book argues that authority is not a thing to be possessed or lost, but a relationship arising in the connections between those laying claim to being an authority and those who assent to it. Matt Carlson examines the practices journalists use to legitimate their work: professional orientation, development of specific news forms, and the personal narratives they circulate to support a privileged social place. He then considers journalists' relationships with the audiences, sources, technologies, and critics that shape journalistic authority in the contemporary media environment. Carlson argues that journalistic authority is always the product of complex and variable relationships. Journalistic Authority weaves together journalists’ relationships with their audiences, sources, technologies, and critics to present a new model for understanding journalism while advocating for practices we need in an age of fake news and shifting norms.