Within the next 3-7 years the US light duty fleet and fuel supply will encounter what is commonly referred to as the "blend wall". This phenomenon describes the situation when more ethanol production has been mandated than can be blended legally in the existing gasoline fuel supply. While there are currently measures under review to extend fuel certification to from 10% to 15% ethanol blends, this will not be enough to reach the existing Renewable Fuel Standard targets that grow over the next decade to 36 billion gallons of biofuel. This research focuses on a quantitative assessment of how to effectively use policies to match the deployment of ethanol with capable vehicles to use ethanol, and the infrastructure to the fuel. A model of the light duty vehicle fleet has been used find the number of vehicles required to meet ethanol fuel usage targets. The key variables explored in this work are (i) the volumetric target for total biofuels (ii) the legal blend limit of ethanol in gasoline, (iii) fleet vehicle sales penetration and (iv) a metric for the relative utilization of ethanol and gasoline for flex fuel vehicles. Each of these factors can be varied independently to understand the existing relationship between each in the context of the US light-duty vehicle fleet. Ultimately, coordinated polices focusing on each of these key factors can ease the transformation of the automotive fuel industry away from petroleum dominated supplies.

The light-duty vehicle fleet is expected to undergo substantial technological changes over the next several decades. New powertrain designs, alternative fuels, advanced materials and significant changes to the vehicle body are being driven by increasingly stringent fuel economy and greenhouse gas emission standards. By the end of the next decade, cars and light-duty trucks will be more fuel efficient, weigh less, emit less air pollutants, have more safety features, and will be more expensive to purchase relative to current vehicles. Though the gasoline-powered spark ignition engine will continue to be the dominant powertrain configuration even through 2030, such vehicles will be equipped with advanced technologies, materials, electronics and controls, and aerodynamics. And by 2030, the deployment of alternative methods to propel and fuel vehicles and alternative modes of transportation, including autonomous vehicles, will be well underway. What are these new technologies - how will they work, and will some technologies be more effective than others? Written to inform The United States Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards, this new report from the National Research Council is a technical evaluation of costs, benefits, and implementation issues of fuel reduction technologies for next-generation light-duty vehicles. Cost, Effectiveness, and Deployment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles estimates the cost, potential efficiency improvements, and barriers to commercial deployment of technologies that might be employed from 2020 to 2030. This report describes these promising technologies and makes recommendations for their inclusion on the list of technologies applicable for the 2017-2025 CAFE standards.

The state of Ohio established a project to demonstrate the use of ethanol flexible-fuel vehicles (FFV) in their fleet operations. This study includes ten FFVs and three gasoline vehicles operated by five state agencies. The two-year project included data collection on vehicles maintenance and fueling, cost of operation, and fleet management comments. The project also included emissions testing oftwo ethanol FFVs and two standard gasoline vehicles.

(cont.) Integrating vehicle and fuel scenarios showed that measures which reduce greenhouse gas emissions also reduce petroleum consumption, but the converse is not necessarily true. Policy efforts therefore should be focused on measures that improve both energy security and carbon emissions at the same time. While up to 35 percent reduction in fleet GHG emissions from a No Change scenario is possible by 2035, the magnitude of changes required to achieve these reductions are daunting, as all of the current trends run counter to the changes required.