A woman can only be empowered if she has the right tools and knowledge to carve a path that will lead her to a happier and more fulfilling lifestyle throughout her life. We are unique. We are biologically superior. We multitask; we carry life within us; we go through challenges during menopause and we do that while raising families and contributing to society. In doing all of the above, many of us neglect the very foundation that we instill in others, our health and self-worth. The main focus of this book is to empower women, to give them useful knowledge and dispelling myths about themselves with regards to fitness and nutrition. They need to be encouraged to start their personal journeys and lead healthier and happier lives the right way. Written in an easy to understand format, the material is separated into two categories: Empowering Women. Through Nourishment and Empowering Women Through Motion. They are taught not to fear the “unknown” and to embrace the possibilities by making simple changes in their lives. It is not just about wanting to be better, it’s about wanting to learn how to do it right.

Academic food ethics incorporates work from philosophy but also anthropology, economics, the environmental sciences and other natural sciences, geography, law, and sociology. Scholars from these fields have been producing work for decades on the food system, and on ethical, social, and policy issues connected to the food system. Yet in the last several years, there has been a notable increase in philosophical work on these issues-work that draws on multiple literatures within practical ethics, normative ethics and political philosophy. This handbook provides a sample of that philosophical work across multiple areas of food ethics: conventional agriculture and alternatives to it; animals; consumption; food justice; food politics; food workers; and, food and identity.

There is, literally, a world of difference between the statements "Everyone should have adequate food," and "Everyone has the right to adequate food." In George Kent's view, the lofty rhetoric of the first statement will not be fulfilled until we take the second statement seriously. Kent sees hunger as a deeply political problem. Too many people do not have adequate control over local resources and cannot create the circumstances that would allow them to do meaningful, productive work and provide for themselves. The human right to an adequate livelihood, including the human right to adequate food, needs to be implemented worldwide in a systematic way. Freedom from Want makes it clear that feeding people will not solve the problem of hunger, for feeding programs can only be a short-term treatment of a symptom, not a cure. The real solution lies in empowering the poor. Governments, in particular, must ensure that their people face enabling conditions that allow citizens to provide for themselves. In a wider sense, Kent brings an understanding of human rights as a universal system, applicable to all nations on a global scale. If, as Kent argues, everyone has a human right to adequate food, it follows that those who can empower the poor have a duty to see that right implemented, and the obligation to be held morally and legally accountable, for seeing that that right is realized for everyone, everywhere.