If you litigate or preside in any court in the state of New York, you know just how confounding the state's evidence law can be. New York Evidence Handbook is the new, comprehensive guide to all of the rules and principles of evidence applicable in New York courts. This new 1,000+ page handbook presents a practical, contemporary approach to evidence -- written with the real-world challenges of the New York trial lawyer and judge in mind. It gathers into one, easy-to-use handbook all of the rules, the leading decisions and the significant statutes you need to consider when assessing the admissibility of evidence. The book walks you through all the rules and their operation (as they relate to judicial notice, presumptions, relevance, the best evidence rule, etc.), discussing all of the leading authorities and citing numerous trial examples. Throughout New York Evidence Handbook, special attention is paid to helping you quickly solve commonly encountered, but difficult, evidence questions.

In this important study Dr Smith uses a wide range of primary materials to provide the first modern comprehensive examination of the work, writings and ideas of James Fitzjames Stephen. Stephen's broad rationalist/utilitarian ethical and intellectual stance manifested itself most prominently in law and social and political philosophy. Stephen's turn of mind led him to perceive the substance of literature and religious orthodoxy as of complementary interest and relevance to the social and political mores of Victorian England, making him one of Dickens' and Cardinal Newman's most formidable and trenchant critics. Dr Smith's account is the first to set Stephen's life and thought in its proper Victorian context, and marks a significant addition to the growing literature on the intellectual history of nineteenth-century England.

BOOK DESCRIPTION: Logical relevance is an essential feature of evidence for both John Maynard Keynes and Bertrand Russell - and also for the last five centuries of English evidence law. If it is not relevant, it is not evidence. If it is not evidence, it is not relevant. It has been widely held that Keynes himself invented the theory that probability is degree of logical relevance. This book is the first study of the legal origins of Keynes' and Russell's logicist theories of probability. Like Dejnozka's other books, this book upends received thought. Following J. L. Montrose, whom he anthologizes, the legal scholar William Twining denies that some of the great evidence law writers had relevance rules. Dejnozka quotes and discusses the relevance rules of those writers. The Keynes scholar Robert Skidelsky holds that Keynes himself discovered the relation between probability and logical relevance. Dejnozka quotes and discusses that relation as affirmed throughout the last five centuries of English evidence law. Most relevantists were members of the Inner Temple law bar, and Keynes was too. // PRAISE FOR THE BOOK 1: "Jan Dejnozka's Logical Relevance in English Evidence Law innovatively explores the links between the evolution of the Anglo-American law of evidence and the philosophical investigations of Keynes and Russell. He provides a fascinating interdisciplinary examination between two disciplines not ordinarily studied together. Dejnozka's study should be of interest to scholars interested in evidence, regardless of discipline." - Barbara J. Shapiro. // Barbara J. Shapiro is professor emerita of rhetoric at the University of California at Berkeley. Her books include _Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Probable Cause: Historical Perspectives on the Anglo-American Law of Evidence_ (University of California Press) and _Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships Between Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature_ (Princeton University Press). // PRAISE FOR THE BOOK 2: "Dejnozka challenges the reader to open his mind for a new interpretation of Russell's work, in particular that relevance notions have a greater place in his philosophy of logic than has been stressed before. Dejnozka's work is full of material which stimulates one to rethink Russell's philosophy of logic, and it is greatly to the author's credit that he brings to light such a wealth of crucial issues in the history and philosophy of logic." - Shahid Rahman. // Shahid Rahman is exceptional professor of logic and epistemology at the Université de Lille 3 (Charles de Gaulle). He was Director (for the French side) of the du ANR-DFG Franco-German project 2012-2015 (Lille (MESHS)/Konstanz, Prof M. Armgardt): Théorie du Droit et Logique / Jurisprudenz und Logik. His recent papers include "Conditionals and Legal Reasoning: Elements of a Logic of Law," HAL 2017 (with Bernadette Dango), and "Unfolding Parallel Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: Epistemic and Dialectical Meaning in Abū Ishāq al-Shīrāzī's System of Co-Relational Inferences of the Occasioning Factor," Cambridge Journal of Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 2018 (with Muhammad Iqbal). // PRAISE FOR THE BOOK 3: "I have spent my career researching the role of relevance in logic, and I found this book highly "relevant." It points out the profound role that English evidence law had in influencing two of the founders of probability theory and logic, Keynes and Russell. It is well written and very interesting. -J. Michael Dunn. // J. Michael Dunn is professor emeritus of computer science and informatics, Oscar Ewing professor emeritus of philosophy, and founding dean emeritus of the School of Informatics at Indiana University. He was a co-editor of _Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity_, volume 2 (Princeton University Press).