Excerpt from Cases Relating to Railways and Canals, Argued and Adjudged in the Courts of Law and Equity, Vol. 5: 1847 to 1849 Semble, that the only power of apprehension given by sect. 165, is for penalties inflicted by or for offences committed against the act. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1850 edition. Excerpt: ...AND ThE LORD CHANCELLOR. $ 18th. 1848. Barker V. The North Staffordshire Kailway?', Apnl I5a, Company. June 8th, T24th, Sf 28th. HE plaintiffs in this case were the executors of G. Bar-A Railway ker, who died possessed of a lease for a term of years, which notice&afthey required ten parcels of land, on one of which was a brine-pit and steam-engine connected with certain saltworks. The parties could not agree upon the price. The Company then caused a valuation to be made of eight out of the ten parcels; they deposited the determined snm, and gave a bond under their corporate seal, but without sureties, and entered upon the eight parcels, under the 85th section of the Lands Clauses Act. The plaintiffs then filed their bill stating these facts, and praying an injunction to restrain the Company from entering on the two pieces of land not included in the valuation, and also from entering upon or continuing in possession of the other eight pieces until they had paid the purchase-money and compensation for their interest in all the lands comprised in the notice. Vice. Chancellor Knight Bruce granted the injunction as prayed. The Company then made a further valuation of the two pieces of land omitted in the former valuation, deposited the determined sum in addition to the former amount, and delivered a new bond with sureties. They then moved before the Lord Chancellor to discharge the order for the injunction: --Held, affirming the decision of Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce, that the injunction had been rightly granted; that the appeal motion could not be sustained oy the subsequent proceedings of the Company; and it was dismissed with costs. The Company moved, before Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce, to dissolve the injunction, when the...

Excerpt from Cases Relating to Railways and Canals, Argued and Adjudged in the Courts of Law and Equity, Vol. 2: 1840 to 1842 Arruuvrrs Aldridge v. The Great West ern Railway Co. Arnett, Southampton Dock Co. V. Att.-gen. V.birminghan1 and Derby Railway Co. Att. -gen. 17. Eastern Coun ties and Northern and 694, Eastern Railway Cos. 710, n. Aylesbury Railway Co. V Blake, London and Brighton Mount Railway Co. V. 322 Aylesbury Railway Co. V. Bristol Dock Co., Regina 0. 5579121 Bristol and Exeter Railway Barnard v. Wallis 162 00 Doe (i. Payne 0. Burned 0. Hamilton 624 Bristol and Exeter Railway Barrett 0. Stockton and Dar Co., Regina 0. Lingtou Railway Cc. Barrett, Stockton and Dar lingtou Railway Co. V. (ia 466, 11. Bath River Navigation Co. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1852 edition. Excerpt: ...by the above-named Company against a not the correct poor-rate made on the 20th November, 1847, for the parmode of rating a railway to the relief of the poor; but the value which the land occupied in each parish produces, after the due allowances, is that upon which the railway is to be rated in such parish. Any expenses, wherever arising, which the Company can shew to be necessary for keeping the hereditaments, which are the subject of the assessment, attheirvalue.andforthejustprotection of the Company in each parish, may properly be taken into consideration. A Railway Company is entitled to a deduction from the rateable value, in onlcrto countervail the depreciation which takes place in the value of the permanent way, and to maintain it in a state to command the supposed rent, which is the measure of such assessment. Such deduction is not included in working expenses. And, the fact that the Company has not incurred the expense, or laid by from their receipts any sum to meet it, will not disentitle them to make such deduction; in this respect, there is no substantial distinction between a railway and house property, or any other of a perishable nature, which must require renewal. By agreement between the London and Brighton R. C. and the South Eastern R. C, the traffic of the latter was to pass free over a certain portion of the line of the former, in consideration of the traffic of the former passing free over a certain portion of the line of the latter. A certain distance of the line of the appellant Company within the respondent parish, was affected by this arrangement. No part of the South Eastern R. C. was within that parish: --Hdd, that this was the same in substance as if so many tickets were daily issued, without money paid for..